05-01-2017, 05:52 PM
|
#2
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Yikes, Niskanen with a nasty crosscheck to Crosby's head on a scoring opportunity.
Crosby really slow to get up and is taken to the room.
Niskanen gets 5 and a game.
|
|
|
05-01-2017, 05:54 PM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
Yikes, Niskanen with a nasty crosscheck to Crosby's head on a scoring opportunity.
Crosby really slow to get up and is taken to the room.
Niskanen gets 5 and a game.
|
Crosby looks concussed.
Looked accidental by Niskanen but I guess you need to be in control of your stick.
__________________
The masses of humanity have always had to surf.
|
|
|
05-01-2017, 05:55 PM
|
#4
|
#1 Goaltender
|
I don't think it looked malicious, unfortunate play Crosby was falling down as Niskanen hit him. If he's standing he probably doesn't get cross checked in the head.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Canuck-Hater For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-01-2017, 05:56 PM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
|
Hopefully Sid is okay.
Would like to see some more replays, didn't look very malicious by Niskanen. It's definitely worthy of a penalty, but I doubt it's even 2 minutes if not a super star laying on the ice*.
*based on seeing 2 poor angle replays.
|
|
|
05-01-2017, 05:57 PM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canuck-Hater
I don't think it looked malicious, unfortunate play Crosby was falling down as Niskanen hit him. If he's standing he probably doesn't get cross checked in the head.
|
I agree. Looked like a bang bang play and Niskanen was caught off guard that he was on his knees.
|
|
|
05-01-2017, 05:59 PM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
|
It looked like a reactionary move by Niskanen to defend himself while Crosby was falling into him. I believe it would have only been 2 minutes but the injury makes it an automatic 5.
Hopefully Sid is okay.
__________________
The masses of humanity have always had to surf.
|
|
|
05-01-2017, 05:59 PM
|
#8
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
It looked more also like his leg got gimped as he was falling to the ice going one way then the other followed both the cross check to the head. Pens need him as does the league.
|
|
|
05-01-2017, 06:02 PM
|
#9
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
|
How did that not go in? Wow stopped by the shaft.
__________________
The masses of humanity have always had to surf.
|
|
|
05-01-2017, 06:04 PM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SW Calgary
|
Looked accidental for sure but holy crap. Hope Sid is okay.
|
|
|
05-01-2017, 06:12 PM
|
#11
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Oct 2016
Exp:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie
Hopefully Sid is okay.
Would like to see some more replays, didn't look very malicious by Niskanen. It's definitely worthy of a penalty, but I doubt it's even 2 minutes if not a super star laying on the ice*.
*based on seeing 2 poor angle replays.
|
BS. He isn't fooling anyone with that"looking away" trick. Followed thru right to his Dome
__________________
Hey, why don't I just go eat some hay, make things out of clay, lay by the bay? I just may! What'd ya say?
|
|
|
05-01-2017, 06:14 PM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
|
Twitter thinks his knee is hurt
|
|
|
05-01-2017, 06:26 PM
|
#13
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz
Twitter thinks his knee is hurt
|
facebook is sayin ankle
no idea what linkedin thinks
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to IrishSpring2013 For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-01-2017, 06:27 PM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
|
Sullivan said it was his head to NBC.
|
|
|
05-01-2017, 06:45 PM
|
#15
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Definitely interference, NHL actually made a call against the pens which is even more surprising.
|
|
|
05-01-2017, 06:46 PM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
|
That was entertaining with the replays.
__________________
----------
must show all Flames games nationally when they play on Saturdays, Mondays, and Wednesdays !!!
|
|
|
05-01-2017, 06:47 PM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
|
Wow, how was that a goal? What BS! That was about as obvious interference as there can be.
Edit: Washington is successful with the challenge. Not sure why it was allowed to go that far though. The reffing and replay system is a joke.
__________________
The masses of humanity have always had to surf.
Last edited by FireGilbert; 05-01-2017 at 06:49 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FireGilbert For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-01-2017, 06:49 PM
|
#18
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Peterborough, ON
|
Why did trotz even need to use his challenge on that? If the ref on the ice rules goaltender interference on the replay, why can't they just come to that decision on their own?
|
|
|
05-01-2017, 06:50 PM
|
#19
|
Franchise Player
|
I don't understand how that happened. Call it a goal after review, then 2 minutes later call it interference after a coaches challenge.
Are they talking to the same people each time?
|
|
|
05-01-2017, 06:51 PM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob
I don't understand how that happened. Call it a goal after review, then 2 minutes later call it interference after a coaches challenge.
Are they talking to the same people each time?
|
The first review was to see if the net was knocked off its moorings before the puck crossed the goal line.
__________________
----------
must show all Flames games nationally when they play on Saturdays, Mondays, and Wednesdays !!!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to hwy19man For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 AM.
|
|