Originally Posted by Karl
They're right up there with John Garrett & Jack Edwards in terms of homerism.
I don't know if you are watching, but their discussion of the non-goal on Reimer in which Kuhnackl pushed his pad with the puck underneath it into the net was embarrassing—insisting that "he was just playing the puck." Bewildered by the "no goal" call, they then compared it to an instance in the last Penguins v. Devils game in which Murray's pad is whacked by a stick while a goal is scored. How could that possibly count?
It is all so hilarious in the light of the Penguin's game tying goal against the Flames.