View Poll Results: If the election were held today, who would you vote for?
|
Conservatives
|
|
91 |
39.22% |
Liberals
|
|
126 |
54.31% |
NDP
|
|
6 |
2.59% |
Greens
|
|
8 |
3.45% |
Other
|
|
1 |
0.43% |
10-11-2015, 11:42 AM
|
#121
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare
Is there any empirical evidence that boutique tax credits aimed at parents actually increases the birth rate? According to StatsCan, it looks like Harper's baby handouts didn't really have any effect at all.
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tabl...lth85b-eng.htm
Also, Japan is an incredibly insular country that allows very little immigration, but Canada is an open and multicultural society. We can easily avoid the demographic problem Japan is facing though increased immigration. I can see why that solution doesn't appeal to Harper and other Old Stock Canadians, though.
|
I do think it is an economic decision for many Canadians to not reproduce at a natural replacement level, but tax breaks probably miss the mark. Many adults in Canada just don't reach financial stability until their mid 30s, if at all. I bet more Canadians let things like crippling student loans affect their decision to start a family than things like taxes.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 10-11-2015 at 01:10 PM.
|
|
|
10-11-2015, 11:56 AM
|
#122
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
I do think it is an economic decision for many Canadians to not reproduce at a natural replacement level, but tax breaks probably miss the mark. Many adults in Canada just don't reach financial stability until their mid 30s, if at all. I bet more Canadian let things like crippling student loans affect their decision to start a family than things like taxes.
|
Yep affordable child care and housing do far more to encourage reproduction than tax credits.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rubecube For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-11-2015, 12:07 PM
|
#123
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Winnipeg
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartcar
If you intend to vote strategically, I'd recommend you wait until election day.
|
Point is well-taken, but I may be unavailable to vote on the 19th due to work-related travel.
I was more curious if anyone had more up-to-date, local information since these predictions are based off data from previous elections. I feel like the climate surrounding this one is different, and I want to do everything I can to ensure my vote is useful.
__________________
|
|
|
10-11-2015, 01:58 PM
|
#124
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Victoria, BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Codes
Point is well-taken, but I may be unavailable to vote on the 19th due to work-related travel.
I was more curious if anyone had more up-to-date, local information since these predictions are based off data from previous elections. I feel like the climate surrounding this one is different, and I want to do everything I can to ensure my vote is useful.
|
Have you seen this one?
http://www.votetogether.ca/
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Drak For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-11-2015, 04:39 PM
|
#125
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Winnipeg
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drak
|
Negative. Thanks for the link! Same recommendation as other websites I consulted. Anyway, I voted. We'll see how it all plays out.
__________________
|
|
|
10-11-2015, 05:39 PM
|
#126
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
K
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Yep affordable child care and housing do far more to encourage reproduction than tax credits.
|
I don't know.
Apparently nothing does
Quote:
To make having children more attractive, in recent years Berlin has increased monthly government subsidies paid to families with children, benefits for parents who stay home to care for newborns, work leave payments for new fathers and an expansion of national day care services. Despite these efforts, however, the German birthrate has remained at a constant average of 1.4 children per woman for around 40 years.
On Monday, the German Federal Institute for Population Research issued a report looking into the reasons behind the failure to increase the country's birthrate.The results are sobering. For many Germans, establishing a family has taken a backseat to a career, hobbies and friends. The report concludes that "children no longer represent a central aspect of life for all Germans."
|
http://m.spiegel.de/international/germany/a-873635.html
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to EldrickOnIce For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-11-2015, 09:33 PM
|
#127
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce
K
I don't know.
Apparently nothing does
|
Why are countries disappointed when their birthrate is low? Immigration can always replenish any population reductions, and there certainly is no shortage of people would would love to immigrate to first world countries.
__________________
|
|
|
10-11-2015, 09:35 PM
|
#128
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce
|
That's actually really interesting. I also kind of thought that less children would be more prevalent in neoliberal economies, but Germany doesn't fit that description either.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rubecube For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:57 PM.
|
|