Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum > Food and Entertainment
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-29-2014, 04:28 PM   #1
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default Terminator Genisys plot revealed, and err its sharknado

http://io9.com/terminator-genisys-in...938/+tinaamini

Quote:
Sarah Connor isn't the innocent she was when Linda Hamilton first sported feathered hair and acid-washed jeans in the role. Nor is she Hamilton's steely zero body-fat warrior in 1991's T2. Rather, the mother of humanity's messiah was orphaned by a Terminator at age 9. Since then, she's been raised by (brace yourself) Schwarzenegger's Terminator—an older T-800 she calls "Pops"—who is programmed to guard rather than to kill. As a result, Sarah is a highly trained antisocial recluse who's great with a sniper rifle but not so skilled at the nuances of human emotion.
Ummm errr, Crack is bad?
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 04:32 PM   #2
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Im not a huge terminator nerd, but sounds ok enough of a premise to me. Is this a different timeline now? Is the main character in sharknado orphaned and then raised by sharks?
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 04:37 PM   #3
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Daenerys can't be new Sarah Connor, Cersei is new Sarah Connor.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 04:40 PM   #4
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

If we're going to do this plot I want the Terminator puppy

__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 04:41 PM   #5
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Why is Genesis spelled incorrectly? Is that edgy?
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 04:42 PM   #6
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

They don't want people to think that the Terminators are running on a 90's video game console CPU.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
Old 10-29-2014, 04:44 PM   #7
AcGold
Self-Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Will be god awful. They ignore what made the first two good and go to focus groups and completely rearrange the formula. James Cameron knew and sadly won't come back. It will be a focus grouped to death bore, rewriting Sarah Connor's story is a mistake.
AcGold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 04:45 PM   #8
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

But the 90's are what made the Terminator story great...
Muta is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 04:47 PM   #9
cDnStealth
First Line Centre
 
cDnStealth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Terminado? I am totally lost story/continuity wise with this franchise.
cDnStealth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 04:48 PM   #10
trackercowe
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

I am not a fan at all in what's coming. I watched the original Terminator last night, and it's the type of movie I would consider to be "perfect". I wouldn't say that about many movies, but I can't find a single fault with the original (Judgement Day has a few problems).

The new "rehash", reboot, or whatever is problematic to say the least. I guess they want to try something new, but then why force Schwarzenegger's T-800 back into the plot, if they don't intend on keeping the original premise of the first two movies? Schwarzenegger can't even fill the role anymore, as he's clearly past his prime (and I mean 20 years past it).

I get that Schwarzenegger's presence will always be attached to the franchise, but even his CGI appearance in Salvation didn't work. If they wanted to commit to something new they should have just dropped him, and probably moved on from Sarah Connor. While I didn't love Salvation, as least it provided for a few interesting ideas, and was different enough than the first three.

I wouldn't even mind them showing us the actual all our war the machines have with humanity, and end at the point where the T-800 and Kyle Reese are sent back in time. That's just another prequel though, but the war would make it worth it.

The magazine covers also don't give me much hope. They look an awful lot like the Days of Future Past covers. Oh and Jai Courtney is a terrible actor, so that's not a good place to start. Really I just wish James Cameron would helm these rather than working on unnecessary Avatar sequels.


Last edited by trackercowe; 10-29-2014 at 04:53 PM.
trackercowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 04:49 PM   #11
AcGold
Self-Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Ambient yet chilling music, impending doom, time travel, robots without fear or conscience that will do anything to kill and a hero that needed to survive are what made them good. Jurassic Park is still a good movie, so is the original Star Wars Trilogy. Good movies aren't good because of the year they came out.

This movie likely ends the franchise.
AcGold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 04:52 PM   #12
cDnStealth
First Line Centre
 
cDnStealth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AcGold View Post
Ambient yet chilling music, impending doom, time travel, robots without fear or conscience that will do anything to kill and a hero that needed to survive are what made them good. Jurassic Park is still a good movie, so is the original Star Wars Trilogy. Good movies aren't good because of the year they came out.

This movie likely ends the franchise.
You're wrong. It clearly says on those magazine covers; How to Save a Billion-Dollar Franchise.
cDnStealth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 04:53 PM   #13
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

Smartly tie it in with The Matrix. That would be a movie I'd pay to see.
Wormius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 05:03 PM   #14
terminator
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

I'm confused is this a reboot or a continuation of the trilogy?

Lol, if its a reboot Skynet sends back the t800 to kill Sarah Connor, then the t1000 to kill John Connor and then figures it out and goes for Sarah's parents?

In which case she should already be expecting it in T1 and T2. WTF.
terminator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 05:12 PM   #15
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by terminator View Post
I'm confused is this a reboot or a continuation of the trilogy?

Lol, if its a reboot Skynet sends back the t800 to kill Sarah Connor, then the t1000 to kill John Connor and then figures it out and goes for Sarah's parents?

In which case she should already be expecting it in T1 and T2. WTF.
Now you understand the mindfata of Terminator time travel!

So, if it weren't for the first T100 that got sent back, how would Dyson have created the technology to have ever created Skynet in the first place?
Wormius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 06:45 PM   #16
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
Now you understand the mindfata of Terminator time travel!

So, if it weren't for the first T100 that got sent back, how would Dyson have created the technology to have ever created Skynet in the first place?
I thought the chip and arm they found in the hydraulic press just accelerated the discovery and didn't give him the idea.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 06:50 PM   #17
trackercowe
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

I think nik is right, they were already under development of the tech, the arm and chip just pushed up the development process of Skynet.
trackercowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 06:54 PM   #18
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

I know that it still would have happened eventually, but how old would John Connor have been if Dyson hadn't been given the chip and arm from the factory that helped speed up the progress?
Wormius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2014, 07:25 AM   #19
DownhillGoat
Franchise Player
 
DownhillGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

http://mashable.com/2014/10/29/termi...twitter-again/
DownhillGoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2014, 08:10 AM   #20
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

Judging by the photobomb in the Entertainment Weekly cover, this is going to be played as a comedy. Of the actors, I'm afraid that Emilia Clarke is woefully miscast, as she can actually act. They would do well to replace her with Denise Richards, so that she can fit in with the 'Ski Patrol with Guns' vibe that the rest of the cast is throwing out there.
Harry Lime is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Harry Lime For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:00 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021