Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-21-2017, 09:29 AM   #41
Lord Carnage
Scoring Winger
 
Lord Carnage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DropIt View Post
Haula + Tuch + pick seems worth much more than Dumba

I agree... in this case. Its the evaluation of Quantity vs Quality.

Will any of those pieces end up being better than Dumba? Without knowing the pick, I'm not sure Haula or Tuch will... but with the situation that Vegas is in, its one of those times that you could argue Quantity > Quality.
Lord Carnage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 09:32 AM   #42
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DropIt View Post
Haula + Tuch + pick seems worth much more than Dumba
To a team contending like Minny, Dumba likely has more value.

For a rebuilding team, I like what vegas got. Something for now, something for later.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 09:36 AM   #43
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northendzone View Post
is it just me or do trades like this make a mockery of these protected lists. Trading guys so vegas won't take other guys.....
I don't know if I would use the word mockery, but I don't really like it either. I don't like teams trading for "promises". I justify by just considering it as Vegas choosing the player and then trading the player back to the original team. It would essentially be the same thing.

Having said that, I would have preferred it if Vegas could not trade the player back to their original team for a full season. I don't really like the idea that they could use player selection, or just the threat of player selection, as an asset to be traded. It should be for filling out their roster and not as a means for leveraging trade power.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 09:53 AM   #44
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
Having said that, I would have preferred it if Vegas could not trade the player back to their original team for a full season. I don't really like the idea that they could use player selection, or just the threat of player selection, as an asset to be traded. It should be for filling out their roster and not as a means for leveraging trade power.
I think that anything that improves the expansion team is a good thing.

Expansion teams have been so bad in the past, I think the NHL bent over backwards to give them a decent shot of getting some decent assets.

No one is harmed by allowing them to simply trade players back to the team they selected them from, and increases the Vegas player pool.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2017, 10:10 AM   #45
Five-hole
Franchise Player
 
Five-hole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
Exp:
Default

This expansion draft is definitely happening at the right time for the Flames. We lose Stajan, Brouwer, or Kulak (likely), and the Wild lose Haula, Tuch, and a pick. That's not even close to the same ballpark of value.
Five-hole is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Five-hole For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2017, 11:02 AM   #46
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Michael Russo @Russostrib
CLARIFICATION: The #mnwild is getting the conditional draft pick in the Haula/Tuch Vegas arrangement, not the other way around (1/2)

Michael Russo @Russostrib
Replying to @Russostrib
(2/2) Haula's deal is for 3 years, I believe. The conditions are complicated...I'll update blog once I get a good grasp
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 11:15 AM   #47
Oil Stain
Franchise Player
 
Oil Stain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Five-hole View Post
This expansion draft is definitely happening at the right time for the Flames. We lose Stajan, Brouwer, or Kulak (likely), and the Wild lose Haula, Tuch, and a pick. That's not even close to the same ballpark of value.
Vegas's center depth now looks like Shipachev, Haula, Kruger.

There's still a chance they take Stajan, but he's already pushed down to 4th line center on the Knights before all the picks have been announced.
Oil Stain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 11:16 AM   #48
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Why would the Knights give up a pick?
I think they should have held more firm. Wild were in arguably the worst position overall and Vegas had all the leverage.
They should have somehow walked away with Dumba, Scandella or Ek.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2017, 11:36 AM   #49
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
I think that anything that improves the expansion team is a good thing.

Expansion teams have been so bad in the past, I think the NHL bent over backwards to give them a decent shot of getting some decent assets.

No one is harmed by allowing them to simply trade players back to the team they selected them from, and increases the Vegas player pool.
I'm fine with expansion teams being terrible for a few seasons. I guess I can see why the NHL, and particularly, the people paying big bucks for the team wouldn't be OK with it though.

I don't like the process, but I get it and accept it I suppose.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."

Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 06-21-2017 at 11:39 AM.
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 11:38 AM   #50
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

I feel like the Wild make out like bandits here.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2017, 11:39 AM   #51
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

The NHL awards failure...they don't want to be decent in year one
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 11:43 AM   #52
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
I'm fine with expansion teams being terrible for a few seasons. I guess I can see why the NHL, and particularly, the people paying big bucks for the team wouldn't be OK with it though.

I don't like the process, but I get it and accept it I suppose.
It is different this time around than any of the previous expansions. Vegas just paid half a billion dollars for the privilege of playing in the NHL. One team just forked over 12–15% of the League's entire annual revenue, which I think entitles them to a better opportunity to be competitive.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2017, 11:45 AM   #53
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Tuch is 21, and a former #18 pick, with good stats in the minors.

He's not a throw in, and is an expensive piece for Minny to give up to keep their current roster in place.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 11:46 AM   #54
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

*bad information*

Last edited by Geeoff; 06-21-2017 at 12:05 PM.
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 11:48 AM   #55
Oil Stain
Franchise Player
 
Oil Stain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff View Post
There's no incentive for Vegas to tank, as I understand that they will have draft lottery odds as if they finished 3rd worst for the next few years, regardless of where they end up in the standings.
That rumour keeps popping up, but its not true.

They were only guaranteed a top pick in this draft.
Oil Stain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 11:54 AM   #56
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
It is different this time around than any of the previous expansions. Vegas just paid half a billion dollars for the privilege of playing in the NHL. One team just forked over 12–15% of the League's entire annual revenue, which I think entitles them to a better opportunity to be competitive.
I understand that.

Some of these trades seem more like extortion though. Like hey, we'll screw up your roster as much as possible unless you overpay us.

I would have even preferred to have more generous protection rules favouring Vegas than what the rules are now.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 12:04 PM   #57
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Dumba is not Ekblad. Dumba will continue to develop on the Wild and probably become a legit top pair D in a few years. He is in a perfect position to continue his development considering his place on the depth chart.

Getting plopped into a top role on a crappy team is exactly the kind of thing that can de-rail a career. VGK is smarter to turn this opportunity into more value and fill the hardest position to draft (C). There is a plethora of comparable d-men available to them.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 12:05 PM   #58
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain View Post
That rumour keeps popping up, but its not true.

They were only guaranteed a top pick in this draft.
Hmmm. Where did I get this from? Was it in the original rumored rules?

I guess they do have incentive to tank.
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 12:33 PM   #59
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

I wish Vegas was guaranteed the next two #1 overall picks (not including this draft). No teams should have incentive to tank. It would let Vegas work to be competitive now, and force other teams to *gasp* actually try to improve their teams.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 02:52 PM   #60
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Michael Russo @Russostrib
Sounds like Haula deal is 3 yrs around 2.75M AAV w Vegas
Tuch trade will be announced after Haula pick. #mnwild gets conditional 3-rd pick
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:50 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021