Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-28-2017, 06:34 PM   #1
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Icon48 THN: NHL Front Office Confidence Survey

http://www.thehockeynews.com/news/ar...-team-is-doing

Quote:
We created a survey asking people to rank each team’s front office in six different categories. The results are in, and not overly surprising.

The results are in. Just over 1,300 people took our annual Front Office Confidence survey, voting on how they view every team’s ability in six categories: roster building, cap management, drafting and developing, trading, free agency and their overall vision.

Of the over 1,300 voters, not everyone will have workable knowledge of every team’s management group and we ended up with around 800 to 1,000 votes per team. Sample size matters with something like this and we feel we have enough responses here to make a fair ranking based on their votes. The 95 percent confidence interval is +/-0.06 on average, meaning we are 95 percent sure the true results are within a very small range of roughly 0.12. If there’s a team’s spot you disagree with, know that their ranking could be a couple spots higher or lower based on that, but not much.

The overall ranking is determined by a weighted average of the score in each category based on how important survey respondents felt each category was in last year’s survey. Drafting and developing was viewed as the most important front office skill, followed by roster building, vision, cap management, trading and finally free agency. For the Vegas Golden Knights, each category was weighted equally.

What’s different about this year’s edition is that we added team filters to the survey. While the overall rankings will be decided by public opinion, beside that will be the difference in fan base opinion to see how much more or less confident fans of that specific team are in what their team is doing.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2017, 06:36 PM   #2
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Flames have pretty much their entire core locked up long term with zero cap hits over $7M. But their cap management is only ranked 6th? What 5 teams could possibly be in a better situation than that?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to codynw For This Useful Post:
Old 07-28-2017, 06:41 PM   #3
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Takeaway: Coyotes, Devils, and Flyers fans are pretty delusional. Wild, Sharks, and Caps fans are a touch bitter.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2017, 07:14 PM   #4
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
Flames have pretty much their entire core locked up long term with zero cap hits over $7M. But their cap management is only ranked 6th? What 5 teams could possibly be in a better situation than that?
  1. Nashville
  2. Tampa
  3. Carolina
  4. Arizona
  5. Pittsburgh

Not sure what criteria they used to come up with that.

Nashville had one of the lowest payrolls in the league last season and went to the Finals, so they make sense at #1.

Yzerman has been able to get some good-value long-term deals signed. There is risk that he's got a lot of long-term deals and if a couple of those players don't continue improving, he could get stuck in a situation like the Oilers with their 6x6 guys, where you're overpaying the underperformers and underpaying the overperformers.

Carolina had a very low payroll and weren't the worst team in the league, so I guess that's a mark in their favour.

I don't really know how Arizona is on the list at all. They filled up on so many bad dead contracts that they ended up having a bonus overage at the end of the season. Sure, they didn't spend much on their roster, but they also had one of the worst teams in the league. Next year, they're paying more for Calgary's starting goalie than either of their own two goalies.

Pittsburgh's cap strategy seems to be: Have the best players in the world and pay them a lot. Fill out the roster with whatever else you can afford and hope they perform well playing alongside the best players in the world. Can't really argue with success.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2017, 07:31 PM   #5
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Cookin View Post
Takeaway: Coyotes, Devils, and Flyers fans are pretty delusional. Wild, Sharks, and Caps fans are a touch bitter.
I was actually about to say that the Flyers are being grossly underrated here. When you look at what Hextall has done since taking over a team with terrible contracts across the board to completely reconstructing their prospect base and fixing their cap situation, it's miracle work. I'd have the Flyers in my top 3 personally. Their fans are more in touch with their team's management than the public, which is probably confusing Hextall with previous managers.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
Old 07-28-2017, 08:19 PM   #6
jlh2640
First Line Centre
 
jlh2640's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Regina
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
  1. Nashville
  2. Tampa
  3. Carolina
  4. Arizona
  5. Pittsburgh

Not sure what criteria they used to come up with that.

Nashville had one of the lowest payrolls in the league last season and went to the Finals, so they make sense at #1.

Yzerman has been able to get some good-value long-term deals signed. There is risk that he's got a lot of long-term deals and if a couple of those players don't continue improving, he could get stuck in a situation like the Oilers with their 6x6 guys, where you're overpaying the underperformers and underpaying the overperformers.

Carolina had a very low payroll and weren't the worst team in the league, so I guess that's a mark in their favour.

I don't really know how Arizona is on the list at all. They filled up on so many bad dead contracts that they ended up having a bonus overage at the end of the season. Sure, they didn't spend much on their roster, but they also had one of the worst teams in the league. Next year, they're paying more for Calgary's starting goalie than either of their own two goalies.

Pittsburgh's cap strategy seems to be: Have the best players in the world and pay them a lot. Fill out the roster with whatever else you can afford and hope they perform well playing alongside the best players in the world. Can't really argue with success.
Arizona and Carolina suck and dont spend any money so they should not be considered good.
jlh2640 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2017, 09:10 PM   #7
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlh2640 View Post
Arizona and Carolina suck and dont spend any money so they should not be considered good.
The Canes are a fantastic young team.
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to EldrickOnIce For This Useful Post:
Old 07-28-2017, 09:19 PM   #8
jlh2640
First Line Centre
 
jlh2640's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Regina
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
The Canes are a fantastic young team.
Fantastic is a reach man.
jlh2640 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jlh2640 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:45 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021