10-23-2016, 05:20 PM
|
#2
|
|
First Line Centre
|
as in, Freddie? Sure.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to saXon For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 05:20 PM
|
#3
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Cowtown
|
Y'all got any more of them Troubas?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilboimcdavid
Eakins wasn't a bad coach, the team just had 2 bad years, they should've been more patient.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 05:21 PM
|
#4
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesforcup
|
The reason Lindholm is available is because they don't want to pay him what Dougie is getting. Seems kinda like a non starter
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 05:22 PM
|
#5
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Would take him for sure. But not sure what the ask would be.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 05:23 PM
|
#6
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Do a 3-way trade - Dougie to Winnipeg, Trouba to Anaheim, and Lindholm to the Flames.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 05:26 PM
|
#7
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lazypucker
Do a 3-way trade - Dougie to Winnipeg, Trouba to Anaheim, and Lindholm to the Flames.
|
lol wpg would just straight up do the trade with anaheim. They need Left hand d
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 05:27 PM
|
#8
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lazypucker
Do a 3-way trade - Dougie to Winnipeg, Trouba to Anaheim, and Lindholm to the Flames.
|
Again, Anaheim wants to trade Lindholm only because they can't play him 5.5M+. Therefore, Trouba is out of the question
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 05:33 PM
|
#9
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Gio + Kylington for Lindholm and cap dump sign him 6x8
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 05:36 PM
|
#10
|
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
So do the Ducks have to save cap in a deal, or is this just a case of them not wanting to pay him what he wants?
Just for shiggles how about
Sam+Stajan (cap dump) for Lindholm+Rackell or Silfverberg.
Edit: Too much cap tied up in the D. Something involving Hamilton would be better but doesn't seem to be a fit.
Oilers should have held on to Hall and swapped him for Lindholm.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 05:40 PM
|
#11
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Ducks would be dumb to trade Lindholm just because he wants 5.5+. I can't see it happening.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 05:40 PM
|
#12
|
|
Franchise Player
|
They have no cap space. So a trade might just be picks.
|
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 05:50 PM
|
#13
|
|
Franchise Player
|
They want to trade for a top young d that doesn't cost more than 5.5m
So...
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 05:51 PM
|
#14
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
No, it can be a trade for anyone. They just send a cap dump back along the way.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 06:09 PM
|
#15
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
There's a thing called eating/retaining salary.
The question is, is the player coming back worth doing so. Not sure the Flames would have the desire to do so. There's gotta be a salary dump contract the ducks could send this way.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 06:43 PM
|
#16
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
|
Ducks have no choice but to trade him for cap reasons.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 06:48 PM
|
#17
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saqe
No, it can be a trade for anyone. They just send a cap dump back along the way.
|
Well that's only if Anaheim has a player that would be considered a cap dump.
Really, their only overpaid player is Kevin Bieksa and they still need him especially if giving up Lindholm.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 06:53 PM
|
#18
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood
Ducks have no choice but to trade him for cap reasons.
|
I would be trading other players to make room for Lindholm, rather than trading Lindholm himself.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 09:25 PM
|
#19
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
I would be trading other players to make room for Lindholm, rather than trading Lindholm himself.
|
Like who? Take a look at their roster and payroll, there is pretty much no one they can trade who makes any significant amount of money.
The only guy would be Kesler and they're a much better team with Kesler than with Lindholm.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2016, 09:28 PM
|
#20
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Lindholm could be a top pairing defenceman in this league for the next 10+ years. I'm not sure I would take anyone else on the Ducks over him.
You make room for these types of players.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:26 PM.
|
|
Lindholm available
