Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-25-2008, 10:47 AM   #61
Joborule
Franchise Player
 
Joborule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

That can't be a real proposal. It's way to out of wack and infeasible to be pulled off.
Joborule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 11:17 AM   #62
FlaminFeva
Farm Team Player
 
Join Date: May 2008
Exp:
Default

Fitting the Coilers and all their faithful would sit in a giant toilet bowl like the dirty turds they are.
FlaminFeva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 11:29 AM   #63
Walter Reed
First Line Centre
 
Walter Reed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Beautiful Vancouver Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPLovecraft View Post
Does that mean the ice is above ground level? Up in that bowl thingy?
It's my understanding the the ice surface would be on the buildings third level (above ground).
__________________
"Half the general managers in the NHL would would trade their rosters for our roster right now ......... I think I know a little about winning ..." - Kevin Lowe; April 2013


IKTHUS
Walter Reed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 11:34 AM   #64
MolsonInBothHands
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

I immediately thought of these:

MolsonInBothHands is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 11:35 AM   #65
Walter Reed
First Line Centre
 
Walter Reed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Beautiful Vancouver Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post

I can't imagine this thing ever being built.

Having the ice surface above ground level seems terribly impractical.

Where would the dressing rooms be? Where would the Zamboni park?
Ever hear of Madison Square Garden, its ice is above ground ...
Very imaginative design IMO ...
__________________
"Half the general managers in the NHL would would trade their rosters for our roster right now ......... I think I know a little about winning ..." - Kevin Lowe; April 2013


IKTHUS
Walter Reed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 11:42 AM   #66
Flames_Gimp
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hell
Exp:
Default

its a little bit interesting. and i'm going to go against the common theme and say its not impossible to build it as is.

I hope the flames do a real ground breaking design on their new building.
__________________
Flames_Gimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 11:47 AM   #67
Hemmer
Mullet Face
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

I really don't think this building will get built.. especially in that location. This proposal by Gene Dub came out of the blue. It is located in Jasper East where there are already big redevelopment plans, which never did include an arena. LRT accessibility would probably be an issue at this location. I much prefer the Bacarat lands for a new arena. Also very interested in what HOK's design will look like.
Hemmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 11:47 AM   #68
flip
Lifetime Suspension
 
flip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sec 216
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tripin_billie View Post
Fitting,

A giant toilet bowl for the giant turd of Canada!
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlaminFeva View Post
Fitting the Coilers and all their faithful would sit in a giant toilet bowl like the dirty turds they are.
FF, you sir are guilty of the worst of all Fatas. An in thread Fata. It was like the 3rd post too.
flip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 12:59 PM   #69
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Reed View Post
Ever hear of Madison Square Garden, its ice is above ground ...
Very imaginative design IMO ...
Agreed on MSG, and agreed on imaginative. Good? Not so much, but definitely imaginitive.

Oh, and your signature is so much BS, btw.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 02:33 PM   #70
edmontonice
Backup Goalie
 
edmontonice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemmer View Post
I really don't think this building will get built.. especially in that location. This proposal by Gene Dub came out of the blue. It is located in Jasper East where there are already big redevelopment plans, which never did include an arena. LRT accessibility would probably be an issue at this location. I much prefer the Bacarat lands for a new arena. Also very interested in what HOK's design will look like.
It's pretty much on top of the LRT...the walk from Churchill would be a couple blocks.
edmontonice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 01:13 AM   #71
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gargamel View Post
The ice surface at Madison Square Garden is above ground level, but having warm air under it can affect the ice quality there. That shouldn't be a problem in Edmonton though. I think the design is ugly, but since I don't have to look at it on a daily basis and only go there for a game or 2 per season, I'm all in favor of anything different and wacky.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Reed View Post
Ever hear of Madison Square Garden, its ice is above ground ...
Very imaginative design IMO ...
I'll admit that I've never been inside the arena at MSG, but from what I've seen of it on tv and in pictures, the impression I get is that the ice surface is on the third floor of the building, but it isn't suspended 3 stories in the air. That's a significant difference.

The impression I get is that if you were at centre ice at MSG and walked to the Rangers' dressing room, it would be a very similar experience to walking from centre ice at the Saddledome to the Flames' dressing room. The inner workings of the arena are still the inner workings of the arena, just a few floors higher.

Manhattan has expensive real estate, so they built the arena on top of a theater and other venues, but the basic design of the arena is still pretty much the standard that you'll see in every NHL arena. As far as I can tell, there isn't anywhere in MSG that you can look up and see the bottom of the arena, like the Edmonton design implies would be possible.


My interpretation of what this design for the arena in Edmonton would be is that if you were on the ground floor and looked up, you would see the underside of the seating bowl in a tiered step design (like looking up at Devo's hats if you stuck them to the ceiling).

The best part of this design would be standing directly below centre ice and looking up to see the stepped concentric ovals as they grow larger and higher. For that effect to work, there can essentially be no "backstage" area on the arena floor level.

Look at this elevation drawing again and tell me: Where are the dressing rooms going to be? Where's the loading dock going to be? Where are the Zambonis going to park? Where will the Zambonis dump their snow? Where will the ice-making equipment be?




Innovative design is fine and dandy, but if it's not a functional arena, it's failed at its most important task.


Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
Raising the level of the floor to above grade makes handling load ins for concerts/ etc so much more difficult, as well, as you need ramps to get equipment up to the floor, all while wasting space above ground When the floor level is below grade, you can hide those support services from the public view, with a structure like this, hiding those support facilities would be impossible.
Yeah. This is essentially the point I was trying to make.

I'm not critiquing the design just because it's the Oilers and I want to trash them. I want the Oilers to have a great, state-of-the-art building, if for no other reason than to inspire the Flames to build something better.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 11:03 AM   #72
bluntus logicimus
Backup Goalie
 
bluntus logicimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: ABC
Exp:
Default

Dub owns the land on which this arena would supposedly be built (along with some other investors). He is just being a businessman, selling the virtues of the location with a dreamy concept. His location is not part of the six being considered for a downtown location.
Talk on the location has been circulating for months and the overwhelming favourite is the Baccarat Casino grounds, built across the street from an underground LRT station that has been roughed in underneath the new EPCOR tower. I think it's pretty much a done deal. Only question now is if the financing hasn't all dried up but I think the Rexall lease at Northlands doesn't expire until 2014 so there's probably enough time.
As for the design itself, I say kudos to Dub for something truly imaginative. I think the idea of a suspended ice surface is very cool but as others have pointed out here in Edmonton, a difficult logistical problem. The theme for the new arena is supposed to consider open streetfront access, no surface parking and inspired architecture. I think it's a decent effort that touches on all three points but it won't be built.
__________________
Denigration avoids reflecting pools
bluntus logicimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 11:15 AM   #73
Hemmer
Mullet Face
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edmontonice View Post
It's pretty much on top of the LRT...the walk from Churchill would be a couple blocks.
Although Churchill station can be used, it wouldn't be the 'ideal' situation to have to walk a couple blocks from the LRT to the arena. Like bluntus logicimus indicated, a bacarat location is what I prefer.. with an underground LRT station situated directly across the street from the arena.
Hemmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 12:22 PM   #74
1Nite
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

This is gene dub work? The same clown that designed that but ugly city hall that was so went so over budget, and tried to talk mayer howie mandel into building falling over spires that cost $2 million as entrance signs. I hope other designes are better than this.
1Nite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 12:16 PM   #75
t0rrent98
Powerplay Quarterback
 
t0rrent98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Exp:
Default

bump.



http://edmontonjournal.com/sports/ho...-arena-is-nice

I'd like to check out this new arena one day, looks quite nice in that photo. I've a soon to be brother in law who is a Oilers fan so hopefully in the future we will check out a few games here and there in the new arena.
__________________

CPHL Dallas Stars
t0rrent98 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to t0rrent98 For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2016, 12:18 PM   #76
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

you'd think the scoreboard would be one of the final touches
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 12:20 PM   #77
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

damn you ken king.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2016, 12:22 PM   #78
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winebar Kensington
Exp:
Default

Lots of room for throwing jerseys on the ice.
__________________
https://www.mergenlaw.com/
http://cjsw.com/program/fossil-records/
twitter/instagram @troutman1966
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2016, 12:23 PM   #79
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Interior looks pretty good. Still not a fan of the exterior though. I think it's one of the uglier arena's in the league. I'm usually a huge fan of modern looking buildings, but I just can't seem to like the look of this one.
The Yen Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 12:26 PM   #80
Heavy Jack
Franchise Player
 
Heavy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
Lots of room for throwing jerseys on the ice.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Heavy Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Heavy Jack For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:14 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021