02-24-2017, 02:40 PM
|
#41
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87
That is a valid point and I will agree to that. The second round pick can be used as a chip for future deals but personally, I have very little faith that the 2nd round pick will become anything good if they simply use it for the draft.
|
I agree with you.
As Flames fans we've been dutifully trained to not expect a 2nd round draft pick to ever impact the main roster.
The only 2nd round picks that have played more than 200 games in the last 20 years have been Blair Betts, Brandon Prust and Kurtis Foster.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:41 PM
|
#42
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beninho
You don't give up assets like a 2nd rounder when you are a young playoff bubble team. You conserve those assets, Ducks are in win now mode while they have some decent prospects in their farm which allows them to take a gamble on Eaves and possibly losing their first. Great deal for Dallas, ok deal for Anaheim but if they crash out in the conference finals it's a terrible deal. A second round pick in a draft where there is not much separating late first rounders and 3-4th rounders is valuable. Scout well and that pick could easily turn out to be a solid player, every year it happens. Flames are in no place to dish out first and seconds for veteran players who not will be in our future plans.
|
okayyy.... so when do we go from a "young" playoff bubble team to an "underachieving" playoff bubble team ... Not arguing but rather asking for your opinion ... at what point should this team be ready to compete? next year? 2018?
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:41 PM
|
#43
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
This does beg the question, what can the Flames get for Versteeg? Not saying I would necessarily move him but if Eaves can return this...
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:46 PM
|
#44
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigrangy
That's because they blew them all on marginal rentals like Eaves.
You can't succeed in this league without picks.
I'm optimistic about how far the Flames can go this year. They match up well against everyone but San Jose imo. But it's not time to buy with good assets yet. It's still building time.
|
The Flames are 1-1 in SJ this season and 1-0 at home against the Sharks. They were 2-2-1 in their Season Series with SJ last year.
Calgary matches up just fine with the Sharks.
Last edited by Textcritic; 02-24-2017 at 02:52 PM.
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:47 PM
|
#45
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87
Are you talking about Julien? The guy who has like 3 games under his belt with the Habs.. If that is who you are talking about, it's a very small sample size.
|
It was really dumb to be mad at the Flames because the Habs signed Julien
comparable to now being mad that the flames didn't give up a conditional 1st for Eaves
So many factors, for one a conditional from Anaheim is far more valuable
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:48 PM
|
#46
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Berlin, Germany
|
No wrong thread
__________________
GO FLAMES GO. That is all.
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:48 PM
|
#47
|
Our Jessica Fletcher
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
|
I'd have lost my #### if Treliving made this trade.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Fonz For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:48 PM
|
#48
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
This does beg the question, what can the Flames get for Versteeg? Not saying I would necessarily move him but if Eaves can return this...
|
Versteeg's contribution to a playoff berth and a potential run far outstrips what he might garner for the Flames in a trade.
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:48 PM
|
#49
|
Franchise Player
|
Flames, IF they make it likely get the Wild in the first round...should they pull off the upset then would likely get the Hawks in round two
good luck
its called reality
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:49 PM
|
#50
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Kind of shows how weak the draft is. Conditional 1st for eaves? That's a lot.
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:50 PM
|
#51
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
It was really dumb to be mad at the Flames because the Habs signed Julien
comparable to now being mad that the flames didn't give up a conditional 1st for Eaves
So many factors, for one a conditional from Anaheim is far more valuable
|
Yeah, but I hope you are not talking about me being mad.
Flash said "Would not pay a 2nd for Eaves on this flames team." and that is what I responded to. I even mentioned above that if I am the Stars, I would rather take the Ducks offer than the Flames.
However, I will say that if this deal between the Stars-Flames, I wouldn't be opposed to it.
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:51 PM
|
#52
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Flames, IF they make it likely get the Wild in the first round...should they pull off the upset then would likely get the Hawks in round two
good luck
its called reality
|
They have matched up quite well against both those teams this season. It is not some massive mis-match like you suggest.
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:53 PM
|
#53
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Flames, IF they make it likely get the Wild in the first round...should they pull off the upset then would likely get the Hawks in round two
good luck
its called reality
|
It's also called playoffs which is a whole new beast. I know the odds would be in favour of the Hawks but the Flames would also have lots of momentum after beating the top team in the west. Or do you suggest they just surrender at that point and not play any games?
It's playoffs man. Time and Time again you see upsets and cinderalla stories.
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:56 PM
|
#54
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87
It's also called playoffs which is a whole new beast. I know the odds would be in favour of the Hawks but the Flames would also have lots of momentum after beating the top team in the west. Or do you suggest they just surrender at that point and not play any games?
It's playoffs man. Time and Time again you see upsets and cinderalla stories.
|
2 times past the first round in almost 30 years...one time past the 2nd round
this is not the year to mortgage the future
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:56 PM
|
#55
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
Would've been a perfect fit for the Flames.......
|
Not at that cost. It's awesome because this happens right before the Ducks play the Kings
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:58 PM
|
#56
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
2 times past the first round in almost 30 years...one time past the 2nd round
this is not the year to mortgage the future
|
So, when do you think would be a good time to mortgage the future? I understand we are not a contender right now. However, when in your opinion, should the Flames start taking risks?
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:59 PM
|
#57
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87
So, when do you think would be a good time to mortgage the future? I understand we are not a contender right now. However, when in your opinion, should the Flames start taking risks?
|
when they aren't hanging onto a wildcard spot by the thread...hopefully next season or the year after
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:59 PM
|
#58
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
Versteeg's contribution to a playoff berth and a potential run far outstrips what he might garner for the Flames in a trade.
|
Uh, what?
Versteeg is found money. If you can get a 2nd round pick for him I have a really hard time with why you'd say no?
Trade Versteeg, call up Hathaway, play Ferland in the top 6, pick 3 times in first 6 picks or trade all 3 of those picks for a marquee young player to contend faster.
I get it, I get it, you don't trade everyone, but players you do trade are 30 year old forwards on bargain contracts who were looking at playing in Europe until a week before the season started.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:59 PM
|
#59
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Flames, IF they make it likely get the Wild in the first round...should they pull off the upset then would likely get the Hawks in round two
good luck
its called reality
|
The Flames had no problem with the Wild and have won all 3 games against so far. They're 1-1 vs. the Hawks so far.
Flames match up decently with everyone in the West besides the Oilers who have owned them this year.
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 02:59 PM
|
#60
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
This does beg the question, what can the Flames get for Versteeg? Not saying I would necessarily move him but if Eaves can return this...
|
I'd think a 2nd, or a 3rd/conditional 2nd based on playoff success. Versteeg is dirt cheap just like Eaves, so I think Versteeg has more value than someone like Iggy who carries that big hit.
Step 1: Trade Wideman (3rd with retained salary)
Step 2: Trade Versteeg (3rd)
Step 3: Acquire Iginla (late round pick + Joki or Wotherspoon?)
= net assets and net improvement today.
Last edited by ComixZone; 02-24-2017 at 03:02 PM.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 PM.
|
|