02-18-2017, 09:08 PM
|
#1
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
|
Calgary Flames sat down with the league to talk about penalties drawn on the team
As per Elliotte Friedman on HNIC, the Flames and the league sat down to discuss every penalty drawn on the team this year.
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
|
|
|
02-18-2017, 09:28 PM
|
#2
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vancouver
|
Fascinating! But I guess it's being discussed elsewhere?
|
|
|
02-18-2017, 09:29 PM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
I'm not able to watch so I appreciate the news. I wonder what was said?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-18-2017, 09:30 PM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
|
What about all the non calls?
|
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
|
bc-chris,
btimbit,
djsFlames,
Eric,
Francis's Hairpiece,
jammies,
Kipper is King,
Stay Golden,
Stillman16,
Wormius,
Yrebmi
|
02-18-2017, 09:36 PM
|
#5
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
I'm not able to watch so I appreciate the news. I wonder what was said?
|
Elliott Friedman just mentioning the so called "Wideman Conspiracy" and how one of the referees gave him a call because he was not happy about the perception put on the referees of how they are targeting the Flames. Mentions that the league and Flames sat down together to go through every penalty taken by the Flames.
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
|
|
|
02-18-2017, 09:38 PM
|
#6
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rocky Mt House
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
I'm not able to watch so I appreciate the news. I wonder what was said?
|
They just sorta off hand mentioned they sat down and showed where each instance was a penalty.
As already posted - it's the non parity in the calls or non calls that may be more the issue. IMO anyway
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Yrebmi For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-18-2017, 09:44 PM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
|
Whether or not the calls against the Flames were penalties is moot - any potential infraction could be argued to be a penalty.
The issue has to do with the propensity with which penalties are called against the Flames.
The simple fact of the matter is that there are far, far more actual infractions than there are penalties, and it is entirely at the referees' discretion as to which ones are called.
And there is ample evidence that the number of calls on the Flames is imbalanced vs the number against their opponents.
|
|
|
The Following 25 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
#22,
442scotty,
Aeneas,
anyonebutedmonton,
calgarywinning,
christoph186,
Dion,
Flame On,
Flames Draft Watcher,
Francis's Hairpiece,
handgroen,
Itse,
Jimmy Stang,
JT45,
ken0042,
MarkGio,
mikephoen,
OBCT,
Resolute 14,
Roof-Daddy,
slybomb,
Stillman16,
TjRhythmic,
Wormius,
Yrebmi
|
02-18-2017, 09:49 PM
|
#8
|
First Line Centre
|
To me, it's a call vs. non-call examination. Gaudreau gets chopped at until his hand is broken without a call, and Bennett tries to lift a stick a sloppy and he's in the box.
|
|
|
02-18-2017, 09:52 PM
|
#9
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
I think they need to sit down and talk about this again. I'm not convinced of impartiality at all.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien
If we can't fall in love with replaceable bottom 6 players then the terrorists have won.
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-18-2017, 09:55 PM
|
#10
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Calgary
|
☕️
__________________
NHL Flames | Golden Knights | Cal Stampeders | Panthers | Chelsea FC | AVFC | Raptors | Orlando Magic | Blue Jays | Athletics | Inferno CWHL
|
|
|
02-18-2017, 10:01 PM
|
#11
|
First Line Centre
|
People are trying to figure out why gaudreau has not put up as much points this year. Could also be part of the wideman effect. Before the wideman incident, the flames were one of the least penalized teams in the league pretty much since gaudreau started with the team. Since that incodent, the flames are the most penalized team in the league.
That means night after night of gaudreau having to sit for extended periods of time while penalties are killed. Hard for offensive skills to get into sync when that happens.
Coincidentally, both frolik and backlund have flourished offensively since then. They play more minutes due to wing the primary penalty killers. Keeps them fresh in the game.
It is ridiculous how the league and refs have responded since the wideman incident. It's embarrassing to the league.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to stemit14 For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-18-2017, 10:03 PM
|
#12
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Difference in Power Play Opportunities vs Minor Penalties Taken.
Pre-Wideman Incident (2014-15 - 82 games):
PP Opps = 255
MP Taken = 216
= Difference of +39
Pre-Wideman Incident (2015-16 - 47 Games)
PP Opps = 151
MP Taken = 123
= Difference of +28
After Wideman Incident (2015-16 - Without Tkachuk or Brouwer in line up - 35 Games)
PP Opps = 119
MP Taken = 135
= Difference of -16
After Wideman Incident (2016-17 - With New Additions - 58.5 Games)
PP Opps = 192
MP Taken = 248
= Difference of -56
This current Flames team is on pace for '-78' for a penalty differential which based on all the figures that I have compiled, it seems extremely uncharacteristic of a historically positive penalty differential team. So even though the Flames have drawn more penalties, it doesn't matter as they're still receiving considerably more minors then the historical statistics would indicate. There may or may not be a conspiracy at hand, but regardless, the facts may point to something suspicious in nature.
|
|
|
The Following 41 Users Say Thank You to Classic_Sniper For This Useful Post:
|
#22,
442scotty,
calgarywinning,
Cali Panthers Fan,
carom,
Enoch Root,
Eric Vail,
Erick Estrada,
FacePaint,
Flames Draft Watcher,
FLAMESRULE,
flame^thrower,
Francis's Hairpiece,
Funkhouser,
GoFlamesGo,
greyshep,
GullFoss,
HockeyKhan,
HotHotHeat,
Inferno099,
Itse,
jg13,
ken0042,
LTH,
MarkGio,
Mony,
Neeper,
OBCT,
powderjunkie,
Rejean31,
Resolute 14,
roberts10,
Samonadreau,
SkunkyJosh,
slybomb,
spennywalks,
Stillman16,
Street Pharmacist,
Suzles,
Vulcan,
Wormius
|
02-18-2017, 10:05 PM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14
People are trying to figure out why gaudreau has not put up as much points this year. Could also be part of the wideman effect. Before the wideman incident, the flames were one of the least penalized teams in the league pretty much since gaudreau started with the team. Since that incodent, the flames are the most penalized team in the league.
That means night after night of gaudreau having to sit for extended periods of time while penalties are killed. Hard for offensive skills to get into sync when that happens.
Coincidentally, both frolik and backlund have flourished offensively since then. They play more minutes due to wing the primary penalty killers. Keeps them fresh in the game.
It is ridiculous how the league and refs have responded since the wideman incident. It's embarrassing to the league.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
Not to mention that last year when guys slashed, held, interfered with, hooked down Gaudreau it was called. That is not happening at all this year. Teams have noticed they can do whatever they want to him and nothing will be called.
|
|
|
02-18-2017, 10:07 PM
|
#14
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
|
There seems to be a much larger number of what should be penalties on the opposition that are not called, thats the problem more than the penalties the Flames take. Tre needs to re-frame the conversation with the NHL. Maybe some tape from tonights game should go with him.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to puffnstuff For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-18-2017, 10:40 PM
|
#15
|
Franchise Player
|
Watched the Oiler v Flyer game. If Larsson played for the Flames he would have had 3 penalties on his first 2 shifts.
If the refs treated us the way the Oilers get treated we'd be battling for first.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Aeneas For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-18-2017, 10:50 PM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by puffnstuff
There seems to be a much larger number of what should be penalties on the opposition that are not called, thats the problem more than the penalties the Flames take. Tre needs to re-frame the conversation with the NHL. Maybe some tape from tonights game should go with him.
|
Flames are 5th in the NHL in PP opportunities.
I don't think you can make a complaint that other teams aren't getting called enough.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Oil Stain For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-18-2017, 11:10 PM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
|
Oil Stain, read post #12
From +0.5 per game to -0.9 per game
Instantly
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-18-2017, 11:30 PM
|
#18
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain
Flames are 5th in the NHL in PP opportunities.
I don't think you can make a complaint that other teams aren't getting called enough.
|
Sure, the Flames may draw a lot of penalties as well, however the Flames overall since the Wideman incident are at an extreme negative in net pp opportunities/penalties taken. Tkachuk takes a lot of players to the box with him so that has increased the Flames' pp opportunities, but does not alter the discrepancy between pp opportunities vs penalties taken.
|
|
|
02-19-2017, 12:00 AM
|
#19
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
The 5 minute "spear" + misconduct for a stick tap wednesday (even Flyers fans were collectively scratching their heads)
Then 4 minute for Versteeg showing a little attitude and the single PP on Brouwer for a scrum that also included a Canuck participant.
It's getting a bit ridiculous.
We swear we're trying to get rid of Wideman, refs, just take it easy.
You'd swear the Flames were the pesky Bruins with the number of penalties (and severity) that they receive lately.
|
|
|
02-19-2017, 12:01 AM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SW Calgary
|
Whatever they did at this meeting, it didn't work
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:49 AM.
|
|