Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-18-2017, 09:08 PM   #1
hockey.modern
First Line Centre
 
hockey.modern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
Exp:
Flames Calgary Flames sat down with the league to talk about penalties drawn on the team

As per Elliotte Friedman on HNIC, the Flames and the league sat down to discuss every penalty drawn on the team this year.
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
hockey.modern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 09:28 PM   #2
The Professor
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Fascinating! But I guess it's being discussed elsewhere?
The Professor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 09:29 PM   #3
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

I'm not able to watch so I appreciate the news. I wonder what was said?
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2017, 09:30 PM   #4
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

What about all the non calls?
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2017, 09:36 PM   #5
hockey.modern
First Line Centre
 
hockey.modern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
I'm not able to watch so I appreciate the news. I wonder what was said?
Elliott Friedman just mentioning the so called "Wideman Conspiracy" and how one of the referees gave him a call because he was not happy about the perception put on the referees of how they are targeting the Flames. Mentions that the league and Flames sat down together to go through every penalty taken by the Flames.
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
hockey.modern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 09:38 PM   #6
Yrebmi
First Line Centre
 
Yrebmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rocky Mt House
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
I'm not able to watch so I appreciate the news. I wonder what was said?
They just sorta off hand mentioned they sat down and showed where each instance was a penalty.

As already posted - it's the non parity in the calls or non calls that may be more the issue. IMO anyway
Yrebmi is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Yrebmi For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2017, 09:44 PM   #7
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Whether or not the calls against the Flames were penalties is moot - any potential infraction could be argued to be a penalty.

The issue has to do with the propensity with which penalties are called against the Flames.

The simple fact of the matter is that there are far, far more actual infractions than there are penalties, and it is entirely at the referees' discretion as to which ones are called.

And there is ample evidence that the number of calls on the Flames is imbalanced vs the number against their opponents.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 09:49 PM   #8
MarkGio
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

To me, it's a call vs. non-call examination. Gaudreau gets chopped at until his hand is broken without a call, and Bennett tries to lift a stick a sloppy and he's in the box.
MarkGio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 09:52 PM   #9
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

I think they need to sit down and talk about this again. I'm not convinced of impartiality at all.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien View Post
If we can't fall in love with replaceable bottom 6 players then the terrorists have won.
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2017, 09:55 PM   #10
Mony
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Mony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

☕️��
__________________
NHL Flames | Golden Knights | Cal Stampeders | Panthers | Chelsea FC | AVFC | Raptors | Orlando Magic | Blue Jays | Athletics | Inferno CWHL
Mony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 10:01 PM   #11
stemit14
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

People are trying to figure out why gaudreau has not put up as much points this year. Could also be part of the wideman effect. Before the wideman incident, the flames were one of the least penalized teams in the league pretty much since gaudreau started with the team. Since that incodent, the flames are the most penalized team in the league.

That means night after night of gaudreau having to sit for extended periods of time while penalties are killed. Hard for offensive skills to get into sync when that happens.

Coincidentally, both frolik and backlund have flourished offensively since then. They play more minutes due to wing the primary penalty killers. Keeps them fresh in the game.

It is ridiculous how the league and refs have responded since the wideman incident. It's embarrassing to the league.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to stemit14 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2017, 10:03 PM   #12
Classic_Sniper
#1 Goaltender
 
Classic_Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Exp:
Default

Difference in Power Play Opportunities vs Minor Penalties Taken.


Pre-Wideman Incident (2014-15 - 82 games):

PP Opps = 255
MP Taken = 216
= Difference of +39

Pre-Wideman Incident (2015-16 - 47 Games)

PP Opps = 151
MP Taken = 123
= Difference of +28


After Wideman Incident (2015-16 - Without Tkachuk or Brouwer in line up - 35 Games)

PP Opps = 119
MP Taken = 135
= Difference of -16


After Wideman Incident (2016-17 - With New Additions - 58.5 Games)

PP Opps = 192
MP Taken = 248
= Difference of -56


This current Flames team is on pace for '-78' for a penalty differential which based on all the figures that I have compiled, it seems extremely uncharacteristic of a historically positive penalty differential team. So even though the Flames have drawn more penalties, it doesn't matter as they're still receiving considerably more minors then the historical statistics would indicate. There may or may not be a conspiracy at hand, but regardless, the facts may point to something suspicious in nature.
Classic_Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 10:05 PM   #13
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
People are trying to figure out why gaudreau has not put up as much points this year. Could also be part of the wideman effect. Before the wideman incident, the flames were one of the least penalized teams in the league pretty much since gaudreau started with the team. Since that incodent, the flames are the most penalized team in the league.

That means night after night of gaudreau having to sit for extended periods of time while penalties are killed. Hard for offensive skills to get into sync when that happens.

Coincidentally, both frolik and backlund have flourished offensively since then. They play more minutes due to wing the primary penalty killers. Keeps them fresh in the game.

It is ridiculous how the league and refs have responded since the wideman incident. It's embarrassing to the league.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not to mention that last year when guys slashed, held, interfered with, hooked down Gaudreau it was called. That is not happening at all this year. Teams have noticed they can do whatever they want to him and nothing will be called.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 10:07 PM   #14
puffnstuff
#1 Goaltender
 
puffnstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
Exp:
Default

There seems to be a much larger number of what should be penalties on the opposition that are not called, thats the problem more than the penalties the Flames take. Tre needs to re-frame the conversation with the NHL. Maybe some tape from tonights game should go with him.
puffnstuff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to puffnstuff For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2017, 10:40 PM   #15
Aeneas
Franchise Player
 
Aeneas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Exp:
Default

Watched the Oiler v Flyer game. If Larsson played for the Flames he would have had 3 penalties on his first 2 shifts.

If the refs treated us the way the Oilers get treated we'd be battling for first.
Aeneas is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Aeneas For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2017, 10:50 PM   #16
Oil Stain
Franchise Player
 
Oil Stain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puffnstuff View Post
There seems to be a much larger number of what should be penalties on the opposition that are not called, thats the problem more than the penalties the Flames take. Tre needs to re-frame the conversation with the NHL. Maybe some tape from tonights game should go with him.
Flames are 5th in the NHL in PP opportunities.

I don't think you can make a complaint that other teams aren't getting called enough.
Oil Stain is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Oil Stain For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2017, 11:10 PM   #17
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Oil Stain, read post #12

From +0.5 per game to -0.9 per game

Instantly
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2017, 11:30 PM   #18
Classic_Sniper
#1 Goaltender
 
Classic_Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain View Post
Flames are 5th in the NHL in PP opportunities.

I don't think you can make a complaint that other teams aren't getting called enough.
Sure, the Flames may draw a lot of penalties as well, however the Flames overall since the Wideman incident are at an extreme negative in net pp opportunities/penalties taken. Tkachuk takes a lot of players to the box with him so that has increased the Flames' pp opportunities, but does not alter the discrepancy between pp opportunities vs penalties taken.
Classic_Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 12:00 AM   #19
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

The 5 minute "spear" + misconduct for a stick tap wednesday (even Flyers fans were collectively scratching their heads)

Then 4 minute for Versteeg showing a little attitude and the single PP on Brouwer for a scrum that also included a Canuck participant.

It's getting a bit ridiculous.

We swear we're trying to get rid of Wideman, refs, just take it easy.

You'd swear the Flames were the pesky Bruins with the number of penalties (and severity) that they receive lately.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 12:01 AM   #20
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SW Calgary
Exp:
Default

Whatever they did at this meeting, it didn't work
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:49 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021