03-05-2024, 01:14 PM
|
#27361
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded
One year left and Bruins need to restock the cupboards a little. They won’t be able to afford Swayman and Ullmark after next season. If they stick with Ullmark than Swayman will be available.
|
Sure they may want to trade him. But they will expect as much value, or more, than Calgary does for Markstrom. So why is he cheaper?
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:15 PM
|
#27362
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Ullmark is a product of the Bruins team/system
he is an average goalie
|
That’s not true at all. He did just fine in Buffalo, a trash Buffalo team mind you. He’s a good reason why the Bruins had a historic regular season. Everyone is having a hard time replicating that season, but it doesn’t help Bergeron and Krejci are gone.
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:15 PM
|
#27363
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
why would Boston sell at under market?
|
They’ll be picking one of Swayman or Ullmark and their leverage will be significantly reduced. They could ride both and let Ullmark walk but I’d be surprised
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:15 PM
|
#27364
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded
One year left and Bruins need to restock the cupboards a little. They won’t be able to afford Swayman and Ullmark after next season. If they stick with Ullmark than Swayman will be available.
|
That explains why they would trade him, but not why they might let him go for less than market
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:17 PM
|
#27365
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan
That’s not true at all. He did just fine in Buffalo, a trash Buffalo team mind you. He’s a good reason why the Bruins had a historic regular season. Everyone is having a hard time replicating that season, but it doesn’t help Bergeron and Krejci are gone.
|
They just happen to have two of them
I think Markstom is a better goalie, so does Brodeur
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:18 PM
|
#27366
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighLifeMan
Nemec is completely untouchable. That is a top pairing, all situational right handed defensemen within the next two years.
|
Reading how some people here think of Fritz and how incompetent they think he is....
Nemec may not be all that untouchable?
Dare to dream, Arnold.
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:20 PM
|
#27367
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
Nobody is untouchable.
|
Could not agree more, you mean to tell me that a #2 stud of a defenceman and a vezina goalie is not worth what essentially is a downgraded version of hanifin in Nemec, get real
Sound like Fitz just wants to hang onto all of his shiny young players, apparently there is like 6_7 players on this team that are untouchable, I guess a little sacrifice to get a very good starting goaltender is too much for Fitz to bear, enjoy golf season, at least he has priorities straight
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:20 PM
|
#27368
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded
They’ll be picking one of Swayman or Ullmark and their leverage will be significantly reduced. They could ride both and let Ullmark walk but I’d be surprised
|
Whatever leverage might be lost by Boston having to choose would be gained back by the amount of interest in Ullmark around the league. I think there's going to be a lot of teams looking to upgrade their goaltending this offseason.
I don't see any way Ullmark would be cheaper than Markstrom.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.
|
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:20 PM
|
#27369
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
That explains why they would trade him, but not why they might let him go for less than market
|
He’s a UFA and Swayman needs a new contract this offseason. What is the market for a UFA goalie? If the Devils pony up their 1st and Holtz it would still be the best value for a goalie trade since Schneider.
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:21 PM
|
#27370
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Cowtown
|
If Fitz won’t trade Mercer or Holtz for Markstrom he’s gonna sewer his pants at the cost to acquire Ullmark. 4 years younger, signed for one more year at a million dollars less than Markstrom, and last years vezina winner? Yep that would be astronomical.
“If we aren’t able to acquire Markstrom or Ullmark we will set our sights on McDavid”.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilboimcdavid
Eakins wasn't a bad coach, the team just had 2 bad years, they should've been more patient.
|
Last edited by PaperBagger'14; 03-05-2024 at 01:23 PM.
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:21 PM
|
#27371
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAreOne
They'd hang up the phone.
|
Most people on phone calls do that at some point.
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:22 PM
|
#27372
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buff
Reading how some people here think of Fritz and how incompetent they think he is....
Nemec may not be all that untouchable?
Dare to dream, Arnold.
|
Let's all hope he's Chiarelli-esque in his incompetence.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.
|
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:22 PM
|
#27373
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaperBagger'14
If Fitz won’t trade Mercer or Holtz for Markstrom he’s gonna sewer his pants at the cost to acquire Ullmark. 4 years younger, signed for an additional year at a million dollars less than Markstrom, and last years vezina winner? Yep that would be astronomical.
“If we aren’t able to acquire Markstrom or Ullmark we will set our sights on McDavid”.
|
Ullmark has one year left.
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:23 PM
|
#27374
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded
Ullmark has one year left.
|
So even less of a financial burden. And more like a one year rental. With way more teams bidding wioth open wallets in the offseason.
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:24 PM
|
#27375
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Cowtown
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded
Ullmark has one year left.
|
Fixed, thanks. I think my point still stands however.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilboimcdavid
Eakins wasn't a bad coach, the team just had 2 bad years, they should've been more patient.
|
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:24 PM
|
#27376
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded
Ullmark has one year left.
|
and I imagine his stats would be a little different had he been on the Flames the last two years. I think everyone knows this
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:24 PM
|
#27377
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Ullmark is a product of the Bruins team/system
he is an average goalie
|
Brent Krahn is not a fan of Ullmark, FWIW.
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:25 PM
|
#27378
|
Franchise Player
|
Just watched Fitz on Holtz. Oof.
That's part of the unknown here. It seems reasonably certain that
- The Devils offered Holtz at some point
- The Flames have been pushing for Mercer instead.
What we don't know what the Flames' interest in Holtz really is. He is a highly drafted player, but the concerns about him at that time, have largely manifested themselves. He has great hands, and scores goals, but the rest of his game has always been deficient. So...do the Flames see him as someone that can develop into a top 6 player, otherwise, if they don't - it's not a great deal for them.
We look at these players through the lens of draft position, pedigree and stats. However, the Flames would have their own book on the player which could be much different than our perception.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:26 PM
|
#27379
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
So even less of a financial burden. And more like a one year rental. With way more teams bidding wioth open wallets in the offseason.
|
Yeah. That’s cheaper in my mind, especially if he has a limited number of teams he will sign with. The closer a player gets to free agency the more their value will decrease.
|
|
|
03-05-2024, 01:31 PM
|
#27380
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
Just watched Fitz on Holtz. Oof.
That's part of the unknown here. It seems reasonably certain that
- The Devils offered Holtz at some point
- The Flames have been pushing for Mercer instead.
What we don't know what the Flames' interest in Holtz really is. He is a highly drafted player, but the concerns about him at that time, have largely manifested themselves. He has great hands, and scores goals, but the rest of his game has always been deficient. So...do the Flames see him as someone that can develop into a top 6 player, otherwise, if they don't - it's not a great deal for them.
We look at these players through the lens of draft position, pedigree and stats. However, the Flames would have their own book on the player which could be much different than our perception.
|
Great points, would love to know what they see the gap as. Because maybe they love Mercer but still kinda like holtz and his upside. Is the risk of him not hitting his upside worth an additional second? Is it the difference between a first this year and a first next year? Tough to say. But I’m confident that the ask for a retained markstrom is Mercer and this years 1st. And if that has been met it would be done by now
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:20 AM.
|
|