And why the hell are the platforms even allowing apps like that for their operating systems?
Apple wouldn't allow something like that in the App Store, but Google is a bit more Wild West-ish than that. The article does state google took down the offending advertisements (but doesn't mention them taking down the app). It really wouldn't be difficult to market the app in such a way it never explicitly says that it can do this.
The average person who doesn't follow the AI space would be blown away at how straight-forward all of this is becoming. 2024 is probably the year where video really takes off.
Apple wouldn't allow something like that in the App Store, but Google is a bit more Wild West-ish than that. The article does state google took down the offending advertisements (but doesn't mention them taking down the app). It really wouldn't be difficult to market the app in such a way it never explicitly says that it can do this.
The average person who doesn't follow the AI space would be blown away at how straight-forward all of this is becoming. 2024 is probably the year where video really takes off.
It’s not clear how we put the genie back in the bottle when it comes to AI video. Most of the uses for this technology will be benign. We can already customize the faces and bodies of videogame avatars. We’ll soon be able to do the same for any pictures or videos we take. Give yourself a six-pack in those vacation pictures. Or pay for a customized version of Raiders of the Lost Ark where Harrison Ford’s face is replaced by Ryan Reynolds face. Or your own.
News organizations will hopefully develop some kind of authentication standards to filter out deepfakes. But I don’t know how we’ll be able to stop people from privately mixing and matching faces and bodies on their own devices.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
Makes you wonder if we might get to a point of doctored video in courtrooms before the courts get ahead of it and are able to filter AI out?
I’d say that’s probably reality pretty quick. It’ll be ultra ####ed up when young girls get bullied to death by spreading fake revenge porn and common criminals get off because no one can prove real vs fake security footage. What a time to be alive
__________________
No, no…I’m not sloppy, or lazy. This is a sign of the boredom.
I’d say that’s probably reality pretty quick. It’ll be ultra ####ed up when young girls get bullied to death by spreading fake revenge porn and common criminals get off because no one can prove real vs fake security footage. What a time to be alive
That’s already happening. Saw a story on CNN a few weeks agowith a teenage girl who was a victim of such a thing (her and a few other girls in her school). Credit to her she’s taking a hard stance on it and shining a light on the problem. The boy who did it still goes to their school because there’s no real way to prove who did it.
It should count as creation a distribution of child pornography, when the target is underage. If it's real enough to cause real harm then there must be real consequences.
Letting it go as a youthful transgression will only normalize it.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Duruss For This Useful Post:
Some of the clothing popular now doesn’t leave much area the be imagined/extrapolated. Nevertheless I agree it should be treated as distribution of porn, not a harmless prank.
A 14-year-old Florida teen fatally shot his sister in an argument over Christmas gifts, only to be shot moments later by his own teenage brother, authorities said.
The 14 shot his 23yo sister, who is also a mother to a 6yo and a 11mo. He was shot in turn by his 15yo brother.
CTV Calgary landing page has multiple stories of people dying after falling through ice. Yet we still see people (and sometimes their pets too) on the ice, on the Bow River, less than 1 meter from the flowing water.
