01-18-2010, 02:39 PM
|
#1
|
GOAT!
|
Apple's iPad Megathread
Quote:
I spoke to a source at Apple this morning, before the invite hit my inbox, who said the event would likely focus on three projects: The tablet device, iPhone 4, and a new round of iLife 2010 software. While we won't see new iPhone hardware just yet, we will see the next-generation software.
...
Today's Apple invitation is vague as usual, but people love to look for clues in the message. The invite features spray-painted blobs amid vibrant color swatches, which could point to a device that captures "creative" activities. A tablet, perhaps? You bet your bottom dollar. Of course, it could also be a new Apple spray paint can that holds MP3s and unicorn tears. My money remains on the tablet, however.
|
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/...irmed-january/
Last edited by FanIn80; 04-10-2010 at 02:01 AM.
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 02:42 PM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
|
iPhone 4 would probably interest me more than the tablet. I may be in the minority.
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 02:44 PM
|
#3
|
GOAT!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeah_Baby
iPhone 4 would probably interest me more than the tablet. I may be in the minority.
|
I think iPhone OS 4 ranks pretty high on everyone's interest list.
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 02:46 PM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Violating Copyrights
|
Jeez..
The invite went out 4 hours+ ago...
You're slipping FanIn80.
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 02:48 PM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80
I think iPhone OS 4 ranks pretty high on everyone's interest list.
|
In that case it will be the tablet, and the tablet will be a large iPod Touch, thus letting everyone down.
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 02:50 PM
|
#6
|
First Line Centre
|
Everything I've heard about the tablet (speculations and rumours), makes me very uninterested in it. I just don't get the point of it.
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 02:52 PM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
|
This came out earlier, Leo posted his invite around 9am today.
I am waiting to see what the Apple tablet has to offer and the pricing.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 02:53 PM
|
#8
|
GOAT!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnes
Jeez..
The invite went out 4 hours+ ago...
You're slipping FanIn80.
|
Haha. It took a couple hours for me to actually decide to post it.
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 02:53 PM
|
#9
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80
Haha. It took a couple hours for me to actually decide to post it.
|
Clearly you're just trying to bait all the PC guys.
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 02:55 PM
|
#10
|
GOAT!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeah_Baby
Clearly you're just trying to bait all the PC guys.
|
Clearly, this is rue. I mean... what other reason could I possibly have for posting this thread?
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 03:05 PM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
|
But, but its a Fox News link....
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 04:03 PM
|
#13
|
Dances with Wolves
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Section 304
|
I've said it numerous times, but I really hope this is something that could exist in that empty space between the iPhone and the MacBook. Apple really doesn't have a "netbook"-ish device, and I'm hoping this could fill that void. The fact that I'm over-the-moon excited for this is mainly because I'm an absolute geek for this kind of thing, truthfully I give the tablet a 20% chance of impressing me.
It's been widely touted as an e-reader, and that type of device is not something I've ever been interested in. The majority of my "me" time is spend on the train each morning and afternoon and I tend to get nauseated if I try to read in a moving vehicle. The train ride is also another reason it may not work as much for me, as I like the compact size of the iphone for watching tv/movies.
That aside I'm still very excited for this product. I'd say the smart money is on me not buying it, but I'm still chomping at the bit to see it. If some of the rumours are true then not only has Steve Jobs been giving the majority of his time to this project, but he's extremely happy with it. That to me says something. Steve Jobs is a mad man. His attention to detail is so anal that I can't help but be intrigued when somebody says he's excited for something.
As for iPhone 4.0 I'm very interested to see if android has lit a fire under their asses. In keeping with the divorce, I wonder if we'll see something related to that map company they bought? The idea of Apple distancing themselves from google maps maps me borderline weepy, but I'd like to see what's going on.
The last (big) update was for cut/paste and push. Those were huge features that the iPhone was missing. Now that we have those, I have a hard time wondering what the phone really needs. Background running apps? I don't see it happening but I'm wrong most of the time.
I didn't know there could be iLife updates. That perks my ears a lot. I love the iLife programs. I'm a little concerned now that I've made the full switch to aperture though. If they upgrade iPhoto with some crazy features I'll feel defeated.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Russic For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-18-2010, 04:26 PM
|
#14
|
It's not easy being green!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In the tubes to Vancouver Island
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russic
I
As for iPhone 4.0 I'm very interested to see if android has lit a fire under their asses. In keeping with the divorce, I wonder if we'll see something related to that map company they bought? The idea of Apple distancing themselves from google maps maps me borderline weepy, but I'd like to see what's going on.
The last (big) update was for cut/paste and push. Those were huge features that the iPhone was missing. Now that we have those, I have a hard time wondering what the phone really needs. Background running apps? I don't see it happening but I'm wrong most of the time.
|
You know.. my opinion of the 3.0 firmware is that it's regressed things overall. I've found that performance has never been better than 2.2.1 and 1.1.4 on my old 2G iPhone. With the restrictions of not allowing apps to be totally active with the screen locked, I can't see any way in which they allow background apps to run.
__________________
Who is in charge of this product and why haven't they been fired yet?
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 04:33 PM
|
#15
|
Dances with Wolves
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Section 304
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kermitology
You know.. my opinion of the 3.0 firmware is that it's regressed things overall. I've found that performance has never been better than 2.2.1 and 1.1.4 on my old 2G iPhone. With the restrictions of not allowing apps to be totally active with the screen locked, I can't see any way in which they allow background apps to run.
|
Not to mention if they ditched push in favour of background apps it would reflect poorly on the decision to use push in the first place. That doesn't seem like the apple way.
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 05:56 PM
|
#16
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Enil Angus
|
I think the tablet will underwhelm commerically.
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 06:40 PM
|
#17
|
First Line Centre
|
It wouldn't be a good e-reader because it's backlit. Take a look at a kindle or one of the other e-readers with e-ink. The e-ink isn't backlit, it isn't being refreshed, it is very enegery efficient (battery lasts forever), you can read it in the sun. It's as easy on your eyes as reading a piece of paper. Plus the other e-readers cost anywhere from $60-$300.
You can already read your kindle books on your iphone or ipod touch, and I'm sure Amazon would come out with an app for that for the tablet.
To expand on the e-ink, I can't find the company website but there's a company who's already developed coloured e-ink displays.
Found it:
http://www.mirasoldisplays.com/ereader/
Last edited by The Ditch; 01-18-2010 at 06:49 PM.
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 07:46 PM
|
#18
|
#1 Goaltender
|
If the tablet is going to be a first class web browsing experience, as much as it pains me to say it, I can't see how its going to find its way in the marketplace without Flash.
Flash on a phone doesn't make great sense, but on a larger screen like a tablet, I can't see any justification for leaving it out. Mostly, I just want to watch NHL Gamecenter on a tablet
I also think the tablet could open the door wide open for a number of important holes in Apple's strategy:
- wireless sync. Plugging in your tablet to sync with a cable would be teh silly
- home/cloud server for your media. You'll now have a Macbook, an iPhone, and your tablet, and maybe even an AppleTV (or two ). There needs to be a way to consolidate and distribute the media to all these devices that is more functional than iTunes Home Sharing.
- iPhone apps and data syncing on your desktop. I want my iPhone/tablet apps to keep their data in sync - I should be able to check/enter my gas mileage on either device. I should also be able to view the exact same app as a widget in my dashboard on my Macbook. Apple has an iPhone emulator, there is zero excuse for not giving me these apps on my Macbook. If the tablet doesn't run iPhone apps natively, I will consider it a major blunder on Apple's part.
- Tablet should have Back To My Mac capabilities. The iPhone should too, but I'll let it slide because I could see how Apple figures it isn't elegant.
__________________
-Scott
Last edited by sclitheroe; 01-18-2010 at 07:55 PM.
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 08:27 PM
|
#19
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kermitology
You know.. my opinion of the 3.0 firmware is that it's regressed things overall. I've found that performance has never been better than 2.2.1 and 1.1.4 on my old 2G iPhone. With the restrictions of not allowing apps to be totally active with the screen locked, I can't see any way in which they allow background apps to run.
|
I agree, 3.0 seemed like a step backwards. It boggles my mind that I can sync, go upstairs, get my coat on, go to the car, plug in my Touch, and then have to wait 30-60 seconds for it to "update library"...WTH is it doing, it just synced with the computer, didn't it get a list of files then???
__________________
-Scott
|
|
|
01-18-2010, 09:19 PM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ditch
It wouldn't be a good e-reader because it's backlit. Take a look at a kindle or one of the other e-readers with e-ink. The e-ink isn't backlit, it isn't being refreshed, it is very enegery efficient (battery lasts forever), you can read it in the sun. It's as easy on your eyes as reading a piece of paper. Plus the other e-readers cost anywhere from $60-$300.
You can already read your kindle books on your iphone or ipod touch, and I'm sure Amazon would come out with an app for that for the tablet.
To expand on the e-ink, I can't find the company website but there's a company who's already developed coloured e-ink displays.
Found it:
http://www.mirasoldisplays.com/ereader/
|
Thanks for that link. I figured that there must be something out there, or at least something close. I'm only a month or so in with the kindle, but once there is full colour, video etc. I will somehow love it even more!
As far as this thread goes I have a hard time seeing the point of the tablet. I have an iMac, iPhone, iPod and my wife has the touch. We hardly seem to use the iMac as it is just because the other two wifi units basically let us do everything we need to. I guess I could eat my words, but somehow I doubt I'll be buying.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:46 PM.
|
|