02-11-2015, 08:49 AM
|
#1
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Calgarypuck Schedule Analyzer (Updated)
Looks into degree of difficulty for each team based on home and road games, then shows weighted average opposition for each category and a rank.
Flames race is below with principal teams.
|
|
|
The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
apiquard,
Badgers Nose,
belsarius,
burnin_vernon,
DuckmanX,
Finger Cookin,
formulate,
gonzo29,
GreenHardHat,
HerbalTesla,
It's a great day 4 hockey,
Pierre "Monster" McGuire,
PugnaciousIntern,
Resolute 14,
Robbob,
Robo,
Street Pharmacist,
the2bears,
wireframe,
Yrebmi
|
02-11-2015, 08:55 AM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Awesome Bingo! Winnipeg is in tough on the road with an average opponent win% of almost .700. That's nuts. Calgary's remaining home games are a breeze, but most of those are going to be in March, so I expect a decent slide here in February, with the club pulling it out in March
|
|
|
02-11-2015, 08:57 AM
|
#3
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: About 5200 Miles from the Dome
|
Can someone please translate this for me? Is this good? Bad? Help...
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.
Winston Churchill
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Chingas For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-11-2015, 09:02 AM
|
#4
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Some notes
You want a high ranking and a low percentage.
The Flames have the 6th hardest road schedule going in the 30 team league because the average win percentage of their opponents on home ice in those road games is .635. Yikes.
The Flames home schedule is the 10th easiest (ranked 21st hardest), because teams invading the dome are basically just .500 on average on the road.
The table suggests the Flyers could make some noise too.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-11-2015, 09:03 AM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingas
Can someone please translate this for me? Is this good? Bad? Help...
|
The win% displayed is the for the opponents for the team listed on the left. He broke it down by home/away/total.
For instance of you look up Winnipeg on the road, the opponents they'll face have a combined almost .700 win%. That means they have nothing but incredibly tough teams to beat. Flames at home face fairly easy teams with a combined .503 win%
|
|
|
02-11-2015, 09:06 AM
|
#6
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
|
So means if we continue to be a good road team then we are in good shape as our home games should be padding our win total! Thanks Bingo for the analysis. Maybe to be helpful, include a legend that says blue/green is easy, red is hard and yellow is neutral?
Last edited by Journey17; 02-11-2015 at 09:07 AM.
Reason: Missed green!
|
|
|
02-11-2015, 09:13 AM
|
#7
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Journey17
So means if we continue to be a good road team then we are in good shape as our home games should be padding our win total! Thanks Bingo for the analysis. Maybe to be helpful, include a legend that says blue/green is easy, red is hard and yellow is neutral?
|
Good idea!
For now the legend is:
Top Table
Blue is good in that you are playing an average set of bad teams
Red is bad as you are facing an average of very tough teams
Bottom Traffic Lights
Red is bad, tough schedule ranking
Yellow is neutral, average schedule ranking
Green is great, easier schedule
|
|
|
02-11-2015, 09:31 AM
|
#8
|
First Line Centre
|
So reading into this, one would favour the Canucks to grab 2nd in the pacific, then it to be a 3 way fight between Calgary, San Jose and LA for the final spot in the division, then into the wildcard battle with a slumping Winnipeg. Heck, with how hard the central teams' runs are, could 5 Pacific teams make it in?
A thought occurs though - playing teams that have good records at the end of the season, when they may have less to play for (if seeding is more settled) - is that really going to be as difficult as we think?
|
|
|
02-11-2015, 09:35 AM
|
#9
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
This will be fun to watch going forward as I update.
When the Flames finish the upcoming 4 game homestand their likely to have a top 5 worst schedule remaining.
Similarly when they return from that 7 game road trip they will probably move into the easier half of schedules.
|
|
|
02-11-2015, 09:39 AM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Minnesota also plays 5 back to backs with travel. The average teams win% drops about 4-6% in those games and the reverse for the home team.
On the flip side, Vancouver hosts at least 6 more road teams on the second night of a back to back (Winnipeg, San Jose, Dallas, Toronto, Columbus, Colorado, )
Last edited by Street Pharmacist; 02-11-2015 at 09:51 AM.
|
|
|
02-11-2015, 09:41 AM
|
#11
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imported_Aussie
A thought occurs though - playing teams that have good records at the end of the season, when they may have less to play for (if seeding is more settled) - is that really going to be as difficult as we think?
|
Yeah - It's a good question. Are the good teams taking it easy and resting some players and playing backups or are they wanting to keep their momentum going?
__________________
Yah, he's a dick, but he's our dick
|
|
|
02-11-2015, 09:45 AM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
|
Really cool analysis. Thanks for this.
|
|
|
02-11-2015, 10:55 AM
|
#14
|
Could Care Less
|
How important is this 7 game eastern swing? Sheesh. If we can get through that with a .500 point percentage, I think we're playoff bound.
|
|
|
02-11-2015, 10:56 AM
|
#15
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Well. I read the title, and thought that Bingo was predicting a 2-10-15 result for the flames for the remainder of the year. Very uncharacteristically pessimistic from him, and an oddly high number of overtime losses. Then I realized it was the date, with "-" instead of "/".
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Knalus For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-11-2015, 01:49 PM
|
#16
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winebar Kensington
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingas
Can someone please translate this for me? Is this good? Bad? Help...
|
Red - Stop
Yellow - Proceed With Caution
Green = Go
|
|
|
02-11-2015, 03:10 PM
|
#17
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by heep223
How important is this 7 game eastern swing? Sheesh. If we can get through that with a .500 point percentage, I think we're playoff bound.
|
The Flames may need more than that....
28 games 33 points.
5 very tough games left before the East Road Trip, if we get 5 points in those games, it owuld leave the Flames needing 28points 23games . Then If we go 3-3-1 in the eastern trip that would leave Calgary needing 21 points in 16 games. Resulting in the team needing to go 10-5-1 in its remaining 16 games.
And the problem with that is, the end of the season is against teams we cant afford to lose to. We NEED to create room in the next 12 games for any potential L's to other teams in the race.
Obviously this is all determined off shooting for 96pts
|
|
|
02-11-2015, 08:11 PM
|
#18
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: In the now
|
Thanks Bingo, this is a really helpful snapshot.
To make a prediction, I calculated the 'expected value' for each team's remaining games, giving each a projected total based on performance up to this point and opponents remaining.
Home%/(Home%+OppRoad%) = Expected Home % (and the reverse for road)
Multiply each by the number of remaining games (separate for home and away), and taking into account that the average game is worth 2.24(ish) points....
Vancouver (2nd pacific) - 95.79
Calgary (3rd pacific) - 94.75
Winnipeg (1st wildcard) - 94.63
San Jose (2nd wildcard) - 93.31
Minnesota - 90.611
Los Angeles - 88.66
Dallas - 87.87
Colorado - 85.61
LA and Minny were hit hardest by some combination of poor road performance, lots of road games remaining, and tough road schedule left. Obviously there is nothing to say current performance will hold, but these projections give a pretty optimistic view for Flames fans, showing that the 92 point mark could get you in.
|
|
|
02-17-2015, 09:41 AM
|
#19
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Feb 17th update.
http://www.calgarypuck.com/2015/02/c...cker-feb-1715/
Good for the Flames as they have moved back to the 10th toughest schedule with the Sharks, Kings, Canucks and Bruins done in the last week.
Winnipeg remains worst, but all other teams save Vancouver have worse schedules.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-17-2015, 09:49 AM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Well.. it sucks to be in the West based on that. A few East teams have tough schedules, but the West takes up most of the slots on the tough side.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:59 AM.
|
|