View Single Post
Old 04-30-2012, 07:53 PM   #44
Mean Mr. Mustard
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
I dont have the link handy, but in the Globe and Mail story on the crash, they spent a couple paragraphs noting how the Wildrose Party promised to make twinning the road a priority. They then spent about one sentence noting that Redford had done the same. Thought that was interesting - pretty much a case of the PC's word being taken as meaningless since they've managed less than 20k in six years. In six years, virtually the entire length of the 43 was twinned, from Onoway to Grande Prairie (save the Sturgeon Lake Indian Reserve, which spent several years demanding far too much money).

The government was committed to twinning the 43 due to their involvement in the CANAMEX project. But how the heck did the 63 fall by the wayside despite the promises of several years ago? Definitely a question the PCs need to be answering in the Legislature.
While I agree it should have been done years ago at the same time it is a difficult location to build a new road due to the marshlike ground as well as the short construction season. I don't work on a road crew and I pray to god I never have to but talking to people in the industry, it is a difficult road to build regardless as to how much money is thrown at the damn thing.
Mean Mr. Mustard is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mean Mr. Mustard For This Useful Post: