View Single Post
Old 08-17-2016, 06:32 AM   #13
Dan02
Franchise Player
 
Dan02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarywinning View Post
So it's official. The railing does not meet code, and given this isn't a 4 ft deck but a high rise, this should have never been passed.

Again, from the photo's it's clear to see where the developer should have run the railing.

It makes me angry, because of the height, the complete disregard and the contractor that put it in.
It does seem odd where they ended the railing given the size and shape of the pad, however, the code states the gap should be less then 100mm edge to edge not edge to centre. My completely non-scientific analysis using paint and the provided tape measure put the gap somewhere between 9.5 and 10cm meaning the railing passes although it's close.
Dan02 is offline   Reply With Quote