Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community - View Single Post

GGG · 07-31-2017, 12:31 PM

If you read page 10 of the judgement it states the court didn't consider that United Soils wasn't going to Poison the children. The Judge completely ignores the operational pan for the disposal site and instead allows the heresay from a special interest group to be repeated without consequence.

I have an issue with this. People need to be more responsible for false information that they pass on.

Though I do think the judgement in general is right because the women apologized as requested in the original demand. And then the company still sued her based on her apology not being genuine.

07-31-2017, 12:31 PM	#31
GGG Franchise Player Join Date: Aug 2008 Exp:	If you read page 10 of the judgement it states the court didn't consider that United Soils wasn't going to Poison the children. The Judge completely ignores the operational pan for the disposal site and instead allows the heresay from a special interest group to be repeated without consequence. I have an issue with this. People need to be more responsible for false information that they pass on. Though I do think the judgement in general is right because the women apologized as requested in the original demand. And then the company still sued her based on her apology not being genuine. Last edited by GGG; 07-31-2017 at 12:36 PM.