Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
Healthy kids is not just "free money". Having a new generation of healthy kids is in the best interest of all of society, and having access to the proper medications without having to choose between the medications and food or clothes will mean less strain on society later on (since the problems don't get worse even worse).
I'm not one of these mentioned "non-earners"  , but $500 a month for medications means even I would have to make some harder choices. |
In terms of trying to buy votes, however, which group do you think is larger? The one that will see this as a benefit, or the one that will see this as yet another tax burden?