Quote:
Originally Posted by dobbles
Its not about using it to erode his legitimacy or contest the election. It's about pointing out that the man ran a campaign and a platform that caused more people to vote against him than for him. Sure he figured out the right combination of people to get him a win. That doesn't make him a qualified president with a legitimate platform. Its like when an NHL team makes it to the playoffs on loser points and SO wins. It doesn't make them a good team, just a lucky one.
|
be clear. are you saying he's not the legitimate president because Clinton got more votes than he did?
yes or no.
I'm just trying to understand the point you're trying to make.