Quote:
Originally Posted by Flashpoint
Your perception is not uncommon. But Colborne is 26. Not a "kid", and his development finished years ago.
We all like to look at him as that high first rounder with size. But he's not going to be anything more than he is right now.
|
Offensively I think that's a given. But defensively players often improve long into their careers, and if Colborne could play a bit more of a two-way game he would be a much more useful player.
That said, I don't expect it to happen and while I wouldn't have minded him back at 2.5M a year, I'm not against cutting him / letting him walk. (And I always liked Colborne more than many others on this board.)