Quote:
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus
Is all this just a case of lots of smoke and no fire? Even if your other side of the truth is totally correct what does it matter? She still lost to a candidate that couldn't win a spelling bee against an 8 year old let alone a presidential election. Countless polls even during the democratic primary's showed up to 60% of Americans didn't trust her, Trump's team slammed her perceived lack of honestly and trustworthiness to death. Trump could get on stage and lie threw his teeth and still win the polls against her for this.
Since it's your belief Clinton was the next snow white how about explaining your reason how she could ever loose to that crazy idiot.
|
You're moving goal posts and creating straw men. She's not snow white and She lost for a variety of reasons:
1) Decades of demonization as evidenced above
2) Personality
3) Comey letter
4) tactical errors
5) being female
6) macro level political movements (ecumbent party, economic issues,etc)
Yes it's smoke and no fire. Consider the following:
1) There's been innuendo creating smoke for decades without a single fire.
2) All that despite multiple operatives who's sole job was to find something on them
3) Hacked access to teens of thousands of emails, yet nothing showed anything of importance
4) FBI had access to teens of thousands more emails, yet nothing
5) Clinton Foundation financials are fairly open, yet no one has found anything
At some point, if there was something there they'd have been caught, no?