View Single Post
Old 07-26-2014, 04:39 PM   #12
Roughneck
#1 Goaltender
 
Roughneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the middle
Exp:
Default

Just picking out some of the arguments from the Clinic's side:

Quote:
Greene said doctors at the clinic feel “a child of an ethnic background should have the ability to be able to identify with their ethnic roots.” He added patients should have a “cultural connection” to their donors.
Quote:
Greene said the clinic’s policy follows similar guidelines used with in-province adoption and foster care, where children are placed with families of their same cultural background whenever possible.
Quote:
Greene was adamant the rule follows the spirit of Canada’s Assisted Human Reproduction Act, which demands doctors place priority on the well-being of potential children and refrain from producing “designer” babies.
Quote:
They were not infertile but had hoped to use non-Caucasian sperm. “Our psychologist evaluated them and really didn’t see why a couple that is not infertile should be choosing sperm donors they have no cultural relationship with.”
Quote:
Interracial couples treated at the clinic have the option of using donors that are ethnically similar to either one of the partners, he added, noting most patients want their children to resemble them.

I mean it does seem like a policy that does think of the children, but the explanations don't seem to have that much conviction.

Basically the policy is that they will help you make a baby that you can make yourself, so 'rainbow babies' are allowed if you're a 'rainbow couple'.
Roughneck is offline   Reply With Quote