Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger
Maybe it's just me but the union has an obligation to protect the other employees too and making sure a murderer sticks around is not beneficial to anyone.
What is the employer supposed to do? If the union has used their power to maintain employment for a murderer then the employer is limited in their options aren't they? If employers who had unionized employees could just ignore the rules of their collective bargaining and union agreement then the union would be useless.
|
Better documentation to support termination. Better negotiating terms when making the collective agreement. Building the case for cause. At this point she wasn't a murderer she made "errors" when administering medication. So protecting the ability of union members to get other jobs is in all of memberships best interests.