Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
How is an asset that depreciates to zero in 4 years, better than an asset that could play on the 2nd line for 10 years or be traded for another asset during that time?
|
Agreed. I know everyone likes to bring up the hypothetical "Iggy to the Penguins" trade but even to be able to get one of their D prospects and their 1st would be a reasonable return at this point and much better than letting Iggy deteriorate into a 3rd liner on a brutal team.