Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh
I say BS! Luongo signing was organization's belief in his abilities and commitment to make him a franchise player. His own bad play resulted in him being moved to a back-up position.
|
His own bad play?
You mean the bad play that had him posting a .919 Sv % and 2.41 GAA in his last season as starter? Or the bad play in which he had two shut-outs in the SCF while the Canucks skaters set a record for futility in scoring over a 7 game series? Or is it the bad play that has seen him consistently win twice as many games as he losses since coming to Vancouver?
The revisionist history trying to make it seem like Luongo is a bad goalie is laughable.
It isn't 100% the Canucks/Gillis' fault but it is a large majority their fault.