Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
The problem with those photos is that you can't see the crossbar in relation to where the puck contacted the stick. It appears to be a high stick but I'm in the camp that from the replays I have seen that it's not 100% conclusive. I still thing the no-goal in game two was worse because the puck was in and they lied about the call on the ice being goaltender interference.
|
You're looking at it from the wrong perspective. You're relying on the video to show you that the stick is above the crossbar. All you have to see is that the stick is at his shoulders. By the definition of height, it's a high stick.