Quote:
Originally Posted by nickerjones
That's good but that really means nothing. If there were less people there would also be less of all those. If there were less Canadian pig farmers we'd also have less Canadian bacon. Lets just put a ban on the amount kids people can have. That'll definitely cut down on gun deaths.
Duffman in your opinion how many gun related deaths are tolerable? 1? 10? 100? 1000?
Just because they crack down on guns it doesn't mean people aren't going to have them. What are the handgun laws in Canada? IIRC it's next to impossible to get them as a Civilian no?
Funny how no one posted about the gun arrests in Canada over Christmas by drug dealers at a mall, if it would have happened in America a thread would have be started praising Obama and his gun crackdown. Nonetheless , I think there was even a semi recent shooting at a Vietnamese restaurant by cineplex. My point is you have stringent gun laws but look who is still toting around guns. People are going to get guns if they want them . PLAIN AND SIMPLE FACT .
|
Well then just don't change a thing and keep doing what you are doing as it is working out so well. Or better yet, like you and the NRA say, get more guns in the hands of more people to counteract the gun violence.
Would you suggest Canada also do the same to prevent things like the Eatons Center shooting?