Quote:
Originally Posted by curves2000
There is some legit truth to that claim. What all got started this was Michelle Obama was giving a speech on healthy eating to a bunch of school children and I believe she referenced Subway sandwiches.
Somebody noticed this and mentioned that Subway bread/meats don't deserve the health claim and referenced this chemical for the bread. Subway was than forced to mention it as true and removed it.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/subway-n...-in-our-bread/
On a recent CBC report, researchers found that Subway's chicken breast was only 50% chicken DNA, the rest was all dam fillers. Its interesting what goes into food and the level of food fraud that occurs EVERYWHERE!!
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/mark...food-1.3993967 |
The problem isn't that Subway has garbage food. They absolutely do. The problem is they were forced to removed azodicarbonamide because the science-illiterate blogger Vani Hari (Food Babe) made the case it was unhealthy using the laughable arguments that "it's hard to pronounce" and "they use it to make yoga mats". She makes the false claim that only natural food is good and doesn't understand what toxins are, or how they work. While railing against sugar she sells food loaded with it in her store.