Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
As for the correlation and causation my hypothesis is simple. You don't win enough hockey games with 4+ soft hockey players.
Is that too simple to comprehend?
Show me a team with 4+ soft players and I will show you a team that is not in the playoffs.
|
Frankly, your posts reek of confirmation bias. What I mean is—
Show you a team that is in the playoffs, and you will move heaven and earth to prove that its players are not 'soft'. Since 'softness' is largely in the eye of the beholder, this is easy enough to do. But it doesn't yield any meaningful information about how teams win.