So let me get this straight:
1. I provide a valid opinion that it's unrealistic to think all new GM's comprehend the rules thus the timing of implementing new rules is bad
2. 1 new GM is insulted so I am left to assume they must know all the rules, thus devaluing my argument
3. I point out that the said new GM does not yet comprehend the rules based on a lenghtly (but pretty solid) post, which is normal, but yet helps to strenthen my argument once again.
4. I am called a bully
5. My treatment of a new GM is not acceptable.
It's ironic that you tell me not to devalue the opinions of others now isn't it?
I think I have made my case and I think it is a good one that has been shared by many GM's.
Once again, I can live with the decision and will move on.
Thanks for your time.
|