Seems pretty sketchy on the part of the RCMP. What type of "leads" are they pursuing? There's no way they can't identify a couple that were inside a bank and Starbucks, especially when they have eye-witnesses and presumably have all the information on the car, for some reason bank parking lots like to invest in security cameras. So they have to know who the assailant was that followed a man into Starbucks and suckered punched him killing him - it doesn't matter what transpired earlier, that's at the very least manslaughter based on the witness statements. Not coming out with any public information when you have a murder take place until being forced to because concerned witnesses are contacting the paper a month later. Even the RCMP's excuse that they had all the information they needed and didn't need public assistant points to them 100% knowing who did it, so why hasn't their been charges a month later or at least some type of statement of the incident prior to being hounded by a reporter? Something isn't quite adding up, the assailant must have friends high up.
|