[sworkhard]

Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague

Yes, they are, but they aren't infringed by what we're talking about here. 2(c) has basically no practical force, and 2(d) doesn't apply unless we're literally talking about outlawing a sect of a religion. No one's saying Christians can't get together to practice their religion, it's this particular expression of supposedly religious principles that's being objected to. But maybe you were taking "shut down the Church" literally? If so, sure, but I don't think anyone was really saying that should happen so much as "they should stop doing that".

Yes, you can - section 1 of the charter overrides those freedoms in many cases. All you have to do is make a strong enough Oakes argument. Granted, courts will be loath to do it, but as arguments go, "this is child abuse" is a pretty strong opener.

You still don't know what your arguing against. Please, state what you think my position is.