View Single Post
Old 09-24-2015, 09:19 AM   #50
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Really?

http://www.thestar.com/opinion/edito...editorial.html

So that's between $5 and 13 billion per year in savings. Taken with this:

http://pharmacarenow.ca/learn-more/t...for-pharmacare
It sure sounds to me like a fairly easy and significant win. If you are going to talk totals...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care_in_Canada




That's still roughly a 5% savings.

Most of those measures have already been done, without most of the savings expected.

In 2014, the provincial governments spent $12.1B on medication. In 2013, 12.2B (both figures from Canadian institute for health information). Drug spending is approximately 13.5% of total health expenditure. To save 5% would be essentially cutting total drug spending almost in half. Maybe there's savings on the operations side, but not in drug costs.

The provincial governments are already doing single source generics (tendering, as described in the article above), and it hasn't provided anywhere near the savings expected. Drug expenditures dropped from 2013 to 2014, but almost all of that drop was because an unprecedented number of molecules became generic. Single source tendering also was responsible for a number of drug shortages.

Secondly, almost all growth in drug expenditures is biologics and novel cancer therapies. The number of prescriptions for drugs costing over $1500 per month has skyrocketed. I dispensed $20,000 in Harvoni to one patient for one month yesterday. There's no way to save via tendering here as there's no generics

Last edited by Street Pharmacist; 09-24-2015 at 12:00 PM. Reason: Billions, not Millions. Mo money, mo spelling mistakes
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post: