Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
This seems like a pretty good catch to me. Since we know scum were likely on each vote and we have some borderline confirmed townies (at least during day 1 for Seb) we can start doing process of elimination. Mrkajz is the vote leader right now, and his lack of definitiveness in posting does seem like a scummy behaviour. Lego and Party are also low post counts with some inconsistencies, however. Lego had the terrible "I think she's town voting anyway" comment, and Party Elephant who went after Girly day 1 but not day 2, which makes no sense unless he had some sort of undisclosed motive.
All three have some questionable behaviour, and almost certainly one of them is scum and is trying to hide with a low post count. However, I am concerned that we're latching on to one player and not "running people up the flagpole" enough. We got lots of good vote trains with patterns and unvotes to analyze yesterday, I think it would be good to run a few people up today. And since one of these three is most probably scum, I think they make sense initially.
vote: party elephant
I would be willing to vote any of these if we get close to the deadline and its looking like no lynch (possible if the thread stays this quiet).
|
My thinking is that out of the people that are being batted around right now I would think the person most capable of leading the hosts would be mrkazj. If he is a host and we take him out I think we would put a dent in their ability to coordinate and we might see some panic from them.