For those who received invites:
Are you given a time limit to answer?
Are you given instructions that you cannot talk or post about the invite until you answer them?
For those who received invites after we decided to not accept any (and presuming there isn't any restrictions):
Is there a reason you engaged in conversation with the invitees prior to posting on the board about receiving it?
Why did you answer? Why didn't you just leave the invite open and not answer so that it didn't pass on to the next person and we stall them out?
No one has mentioned anything about the messages restricting them from speaking of the message or speaking about it until they answer the message. So why are all the reports coming AFTER the person receiving them has already engaged in conversation with the invitee? If the consensus is not to accept, why not just ignore the message, report back you've received it and essentially give the groups recruiting the middle finger not allowing them to move on to the next recruit? Why aren't we trying to stall them from inviting (and perhaps recruiting again) until we figure out what they can do? I mean the method of rejecting and letting it pass to the next person really relies on the honour system and being we have absolutely no clue what they are doing and everyone can't be trusted, I'm not sure that system is the best thing. If someone can hold the invite and try to stop the recruiting until we can see what happens with those recruited already, maybe we can get a better hold on what this whole mess is.
|