Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
BS.
If it was "more likely", why didn't it happen?
Never did he single out terrorist states (IE mid-east/muslim dominated countries) as a target either.
And since the US WAS attacked, and there was absolutely no threat of nuclear retaliation...I think you can answer the nonsensical question yourself.
|
Well, for one, a lot of people tend to see Bush (especially in the world outside of the US) as a warmonger.
Bush Invaded Iraq, a lot of people disagreed and still do, but he took a step that most foriegn leaders didn't do.
That is probably the main reason why there would be a lot more outcry from people than the Chirac comments. Not to mention, this is probably getting a little more play in France than it is over here.